Consumer Directed Health Plans

Written by Michael Ertel


Most of you have heard about “consumer directed health plans”. The Bush administration has been a strong supporter of this concept as a way to get a handle on soaring healthcare costs. The recent inaugeration of Mr. Bush signals that consumer directed health plans will increasingly make up a larger percentage of group medical plans overrepparttar next several years. Inrepparttar 103394 past, consumer directed plan designs have taken on many forms: Medical Savings Accounts (MSAs), Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs), Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs) and Health Savings Accounts (HSAs).

Many experts consider HRAs and HSAs to berepparttar 103395 first generation of viable consumer directed health care products. HRAs are typically paired with a high-deductible health plan and are employer-funded Section 105 defined contribution plans. HSAs arerepparttar 103396 latest version of consumer directed health care plans. The core components of HSAs include a high deductible insurance product and a cash spending account. HSAs combinerepparttar 103397 pre-tax treatment of a FSA,repparttar 103398 portability and roll-over characteristics of a 401(k), andrepparttar 103399 tax-free distributions of a Roth IRA.

One ofrepparttar 103400 main goals of any consumer directed health plan should be to getrepparttar 103401 consumer more involved in bothrepparttar 103402 cost and statistical outcomes of certain healthcare procedures. Informed healthcare consumers will make wise healthcare decisions and typically these decisions will result in both lower costs and improved quality.

Pre-empt Radiation or Die

Written by Burak Fenercioglu


Professor Lawrie Challis reminded President George W. Bush’s doctrine of pre-emption with his invention. Now, it is time for mobile industry to put their act together unless they are ready to becomerepparttar next customer battleground.

---

At West Point, in a speech, President George W. Bush sharedrepparttar 103393 doctrine of pre-emption with his cadets that he articulated as a countermeasure to September 11 attacks. Pre-emption, defined asrepparttar 103394 anticipatory use of force inrepparttar 103395 face of an imminent attack, has long been accepted as legitimate and appropriate under international law. Inrepparttar 103396 New National Security Strategy, however,repparttar 103397 Bush’s first administration was broadeningrepparttar 103398 meaning to encompass preventive war as well, in which force may be used even withoutrepparttar 103399 evidence. This particular idea had still been severely debated and really staled but Professor Lawrie Challis’s invention has broughtrepparttar 103400 President’s angle back into perspective.

A simple magnetic bead can reducerepparttar 103401 radiation from hands-free mobile phones to virtually zero. His set of kits stopsrepparttar 103402 radio waves traveling uprepparttar 103403 wire and intorepparttar 103404 head. His take was mobile industry should start using it as a standard and promote it as a marketing material.

Mobile Manufacturers Forum rejected Professor Challis's call for them to be used on hands-free kits. They said, “Beads can have an impact. Butrepparttar 103405 bigger issue is that mobile phones are tested to be comply with standards and have been passed safe.”

Reducing emissions torepparttar 103406 head to zero is possible but manufacturers neglect to put them on hands-free kits. Ignorance is bless. Tests are king. The reality is, even one customer with skepticism of practices is enough for an avalanche inrepparttar 103407 industry.

Look atrepparttar 103408 tobacco industry… Undoubtedly,repparttar 103409 most regretful people not to come up with such an idea like Bush’s were they. The most reviled industry has reachedrepparttar 103410 peak level of saturation but could not cope with ceaseless accusations sincerepparttar 103411 beginning ofrepparttar 103412 90s and lost enormous ground. The strategy of being contentious in good, old days - just like telecom is doing today - triggered looming litigation threats, which in turn, caused big tobacco companies’ stock market value to plummet dramatically.

Today, ranging from pharma to food, plenty of industries would be feelingrepparttar 103413 same pressure that tobacco guys had a decade ago. The lesson is obvious. If a considerably large company is somewhat related to health, it is to their benefit to take extra care of sanitary issues.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use