Zeno of Elea's (b.490 BC) arguments against motion precipitated a crisis in Greek thought. All of these, concerning motion, have had a profound influence on
development of mathematics. They are described in Aristotle's great work 'Physics' and are presented as four arguments in
form of paradoxes, stated below : 1. The Racecourse or Dichotomy Paradox -
There is no motion because that which is moved must arrive at
middle of its course before it arrives at
end. In order to traverse a line segment it's necessary to reach
halfway point, but this requires first reaching
quarter - way point, which first requires reaching
eighth - way point, and so on without end. Hence motion can never begin.
This problem isn't alleviated by
well - known infinite sum ½ + ¼ + 1/8 ... = 1 because Zeno is effectively insisting that
sum be tackled in
reverse direction. What is
first term in such a series ?
( See David Darling : The Universal Book of Mathematics, 2004. )
2. Achilles and
Tortoise -
This is perhaps
most famous of
Zeno's paradoxes.
The slower when running will never be overtaken by
quicker; for that which is persuing must first reach
point from which that which is fleeing started, so that
slower must necessarily always be some distance ahead. Thus, Achilles, however fast he runs, will never catch
plodding Tortoise who started first. And yet, of course, in
real world, faster things do overtake slower ones.
3. The Arrow -
An arrow cannot move at a place at which it is not. But neither can it move at a place at which it is. But a flying arrow is always at
place at which it is. That is, at any instant it is at rest. But if at no instant is it moving, then it is always at rest.
4. The Moving Blocks or Stadium -
Suppose three equal blocks, A , B, C, of width 1, with A and C moving past B at
same speed in opposite directions. Then A takes one time, t, to traverse
width of B, but half
time, t/2, to traverse
width of C. But these are
same length, 1. So A takes both t and t/2 to traverse
distance 1.
( See Simon Blackburn : Dictionary of Philosophy, 1996 )
The German set theorist Adolf Frankel ( 1891 - 1965 ) is one of many modern mathematicians ( Bertrand Russell is another ) who have pointed out that 2,000 years of attempted explanations have not cleared away
mysteries of Zeno's Paradoxes : "Although they have often been dismissed as logical nonsense, many attempts have also been made to dispose of them by means of mathematical theorems, such as
theory of convergent series or
theory of sets. In
end, however,
difficulties inherent in his arguments have always come back with a vengeance, for
human mind is so constructed that it can look at a continuum in two ways that are not quite reconcilable."