Choosing A BrokerWritten by Scott Ervin
Finding The Right Broker Ok, so you have done some research on futures markets, and have decided to try your hand at trading. You have by now evaluated which contracts to trade, either by interest in a specific market, or by your belief that you have good information on future market moves through your job, or contacts you deem well informed. The next decision to consider then, is choosing a broker. The current trend in brokerage houses is to offer rock bottom commissions on round turns, but very little in way of information or support services for their customer base. Although this option is good to have, there are certain issues to consider when looking at these types of brokers. The first realization you should have is an old adage that still holds true, you get what you pay for. Though some traders are experienced enough, and pay for enough outside research to make use of these discount services, most of us will need a lot more help from a professional to be successful long term. With most discount brokerage services, you are on your own. So then, what is alternative? Full-service brokers can be a good alternative for novice or intermediate level trader. The basic idea of full service broker is relatively simple, he or she should be a person who is well informed, accessible to you, and able to help you avoid some of common mistakes made while trading. Additionally, a broker who is good for you should be well informed on markets you are trading, and able to give you recommendations when you're struggling with market strategy. If you have traded before, you probably also know value of having someone reliable to resolve issues dealing with problems with your equity statements, margin, or any other possible office error. The full-service broker should take care of details and problems, leaving your mind free to focus on trading.
| | Project-Aligned CollaborationWritten by Gerd Schmidt
Many companies are using collaboration in their quest to become more efficient and ‘leaner’. Business demands that people collaborate within companies (intra-company) and across company boundaries (inter-company) with suppliers, customers, etc. Collaboration happens where there are two or more people that want to reach same target and need work together to exchange information and complete tasks to achieve goal. This paper introduces Project-Aligned Collaboration and reviews its benefits.Forms of Collaboration Collaboration can take many forms including conversations, meetings and/or sharing information or documents via email. It requires a process of communication and follow-through by team members, and accountability by each individual to deliver her knowledge to team and process. Collaboration also involves internal and external resources. Looking at intra-company collaboration, it is safe to assume that these people can use same tools as they are within same environment. However, even then many teams typically use traditional and familiar collaboration tools - telephone, whiteboard and email. Looking at inter-company collaboration, an additional obstacle arises due to each company’s IT systems. They often are not compatible from one company to other or company policies prevent users from other companies to get access to IT resources for security reasons. The users fall back to traditional collaboration tools such as telephone, whiteboard and email. Current Collaboration Tools With introduction of Internet, web-based collaboration solutions became available to support collaboration. Typically they come in two forms: 1) ‘Meeting-based’ tools providing team members secured access to conduct virtual meetings or ‘web-conferencing’ to share documents, discuss issues or status; or 2) ’Document- or deliverable-centric’ tools, allowing participants to share documents and deliverables between each other. However, task lists, issues management and project milestones are not typically incorporated in these solutions. The team is still left to manage overall processes and repository of information, again relying on key users to manage documents, and use of email for communication of progress, status and issues. Therefore one of key challenges with many of existing collaboration software solutions is that they often do not support management and communication of some critical information for any user to successfully collaborate such as: * What is current status of work that has to be done? * What are steps that need to be executed to get document or deliverable as a result? Lastly, one of major disadvantages of all these collaboration tools – specifically for new members we have to collaborate with, is that new member doesn’t have access to any historical information. Telephone calls that happened in past are not accessible for a new member of team; whiteboards got erased a long time ago; and emails are still available but have to be sent again (which in reality rarely happens). Web-conferencing minutes or issues information is often not available and dependent on team to track, manage and to communicate to new member. Document-centric collaboration portals allow new participant to gain access to historical data and documents but require new member to search on his/her own. These types of collaboration processes require good project management skills on part of team leader and also good execution skills on part of team. The intent is always to deliver but often there are too many obstacles to overcome that prevent efficient forms of collaboration from taking place. The top reasons for failure of most collaborative efforts are: * Lack of assigning clear objectives and milestones * Communication breakdown – not knowing status of progress or issues pending * Not following up with issues in a timely manner Project-Aligned Collaboration The focal point of collaboration is to jointly accomplish a goal. It involves a team that wants to work together to complete key activities or milestones, produce deliverables in a timely manner, and resolve issues as they execute their plan. This type of collaboration can be referred to as Project-Aligned Collaboration. It is based around reality that people not only want to exchange documents and deliverables but also need to know WHO does WHAT at any given time. In addition to WHO does WHAT information, participants also need to know about current status of tasks. Progress can be better understood if all members could see key tasks that have to be executed to finish project (e.g. produce document/deliverable/etc.).
|