Choosing A Broker

Written by Scott Ervin


Finding The Right Broker

Ok, so you have done some research onrepparttar futures markets, and have decided to try your hand at trading. You have by now evaluated which contracts to trade, either by interest in a specific market, or by your belief that you have good information on future market moves through your job, or contacts you deem well informed. The next decision to consider then, is choosing a broker.

The current trend in brokerage houses is to offer rock bottom commissions on round turns, but very little inrepparttar 104440 way of information or support services for their customer base. Although this option is good to have, there are certain issues to consider when looking at these types of brokers. The first realization you should have is an old adage that still holds true, you get what you pay for. Though some traders are experienced enough, and pay for enough outside research to make use of these discount services, most of us will need a lot more help from a professional to be successful long term. With most discount brokerage services, you are on your own.

So then, what isrepparttar 104441 alternative? Full-service brokers can be a good alternative forrepparttar 104442 novice or intermediate level trader. The basic idea ofrepparttar 104443 full service broker is relatively simple, he or she should be a person who is well informed, accessible to you, and able to help you avoid some of repparttar 104444 common mistakes made while trading. Additionally, a broker who is good for you should be well informed onrepparttar 104445 markets you are trading, and able to give you recommendations when you're struggling with market strategy. If you have traded before, you probably also knowrepparttar 104446 value of having someone reliable to resolve issues dealing with problems with your equity statements, margin, or any other possible office error. The full-service broker should take care of details and problems, leaving your mind free to focus on trading.

Project-Aligned Collaboration

Written by Gerd Schmidt


Many companies are using collaboration in their quest to become more efficient and ‘leaner’. Business demands that people collaborate within companies (intra-company) and across company boundaries (inter-company) with suppliers, customers, etc. Collaboration happens where there are two or more people that want to reachrepparttar same target and need work together to exchange information and complete tasks to achieverepparttar 104439 goal. This paper introduces Project-Aligned Collaboration and reviews its benefits.

Forms of Collaboration

Collaboration can take many forms including conversations, meetings and/or sharing information or documents via email. It requires a process of communication and follow-through by team members, and accountability by each individual to deliver her knowledge torepparttar 104440 team and process.

Collaboration also involves internal and external resources. Looking at intra-company collaboration, it is safe to assume that these people can userepparttar 104441 same tools as they are withinrepparttar 104442 same environment. However, even then many teams typically userepparttar 104443 traditional and familiar collaboration tools - telephone, whiteboard and email.

Looking atrepparttar 104444 inter-company collaboration, an additional obstacle arises due to each company’s IT systems. They often are not compatible from one company torepparttar 104445 other or company policies prevent users from other companies to get access to IT resources for security reasons. The users fall back to traditional collaboration tools such asrepparttar 104446 telephone, whiteboard and email.

Current Collaboration Tools

Withrepparttar 104447 introduction ofrepparttar 104448 Internet, web-based collaboration solutions became available to support collaboration. Typically they come in two forms: 1) ‘Meeting-based’ tools providing team members secured access to conduct virtual meetings or ‘web-conferencing’ to share documents, discuss issues or status; or 2) ’Document- or deliverable-centric’ tools, allowing participants to share documents and deliverables between each other.

However, task lists, issues management and project milestones are not typically incorporated in these solutions. The team is still left to managerepparttar 104449 overall processes and repository of information, again relying on key users to manage documents, andrepparttar 104450 use of email for communication of progress, status and issues. Therefore one ofrepparttar 104451 key challenges with many ofrepparttar 104452 existing collaboration software solutions is that they often do not supportrepparttar 104453 management and communication of some critical information for any user to successfully collaborate such as:

* What isrepparttar 104454 current status ofrepparttar 104455 work that has to be done? * What arerepparttar 104456 steps that need to be executed to getrepparttar 104457 document or deliverable as a result?

Lastly, one ofrepparttar 104458 major disadvantages of all these collaboration tools – specifically for new members we have to collaborate with, is thatrepparttar 104459 new member doesn’t have access to any historical information. Telephone calls that happened inrepparttar 104460 past are not accessible for a new member ofrepparttar 104461 team; whiteboards got erased a long time ago; and emails are still available but have to be sent again (which in reality rarely happens). Web-conferencing minutes or issues information is often not available and dependent onrepparttar 104462 team to track, manage and to communicate torepparttar 104463 new member. Document-centric collaboration portals allowrepparttar 104464 new participant to gain access to historical data and documents but requirerepparttar 104465 new member to search on his/her own.

These types of collaboration processes require good project management skills onrepparttar 104466 part ofrepparttar 104467 team leader and also good execution skills onrepparttar 104468 part ofrepparttar 104469 team. The intent is always to deliver but often there are too many obstacles to overcome that prevent efficient forms of collaboration from taking place. The top reasons for failure of most collaborative efforts are:

* Lack of assigning clear objectives and milestones * Communication breakdown – not knowingrepparttar 104470 status of progress or issues pending * Not following up with issues in a timely manner

Project-Aligned Collaboration

The focal point of collaboration is to jointly accomplish a goal. It involves a team that wants to work together to complete key activities or milestones, produce deliverables in a timely manner, and resolve issues as they execute their plan. This type of collaboration can be referred to as Project-Aligned Collaboration. It is based aroundrepparttar 104471 reality that people not only want to exchange documents and deliverables but also need to know WHO does WHAT at any given time. In addition torepparttar 104472 WHO does WHAT information, participants also need to know aboutrepparttar 104473 current status of tasks. Progress can be better understood if all members could seerepparttar 104474 key tasks that have to be executed to finishrepparttar 104475 project (e.g. producerepparttar 104476 document/deliverable/etc.).

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use