True, web content theft has potential to destroy web completely if taken to extremes. What would be point of creating anything if it were immediately stolen?

But by same token, shoplifting has potential to destroy retail if taken to its logical conclusion. Yet that hasn't stopped chain stores from reaping a fortune. As in shopping mall, so on web: system still works because vast majority of users don't steal.

One of biggest hidden risks of web content theft is in fact that webmasters will overreact to perceived threat. Could copyright theft fears create an atmosphere of mistrust among publishers, just as phishing and fraud have created an atmosphere of distrust among web users? While we are nowhere near that point yet, it's still worth giving hysteria a reality check before it gets out of control.

Dangers of Obsessing over Web Content Theft and Internet Copyright Violations

1. Unnecessary Web Content Copyright Registration

Some paranoid webmasters have actually gone to trouble and expense of registering copyright of their work with government--often at urging of paid services that charge a hefty fee. Yet copyright registration provides no protection against theft. It only provides statutory damages if somehow you ever take thief to court, AND he or she shows up AND can pay (unlikely).

I was recently struck by fact that top-ranking web pages on Google are consistently much better written than vast majority of what one reads on web. Yet traditional SEO wisdom has little to say about good writing. Does Google, world's wealthiest media company, really only display web pages that meet arcane technical criteria? Does Google, like so many website owners, really get so caught up in process of algorithm that it misses whole point?

Apparently not. Most Common On-the-Page Website Content Success Factors Whatever technical mechanism, Google is doing a pretty good job of identifying websites with good content and rewarding them with high rankings.

I looked at Google's top five pages for five most searched-on keywords, as identified by WordTracker on June 27, 2005. Typically, top five pages receive an overwhelming majority of traffic delivered by Google.

The web pages that contained written content (a small but significant portion were image galleries) all shared following features:

Updating: frequent updating of content, at least once every few weeks, and more often, once a week or more.

Spelling and grammar: few or no errors. No page had more than three misspelled words or four grammatical errors. Note: spelling and grammar errors were identified by using Microsoft Word's check feature, and then ruling out words marked as misspellings that are either proper names or new words that are simply not in dictionary. Does Google use SpellCheck? I can already hear scoffing on other side of this computer screen. Before you dismiss idea completely, keep in mind that no one really does know what 100 factors in Google's algorithm are. But whether mechanism is SpellCheck or a better shot at link popularity thanks to great credibility, or something else entirely, results remain same.

Paragraphs: primarily brief (1-4 sentences). Few or no long blocks of text. Lists: both bulleted and numbered, form a large part of text.

Sentence length: mostly brief (10 words or fewer). Medium-length and long sentences are sprinkled throughout text rather than clumped together.

Contextual relevance: text contains numerous terms related to keyword, as well as stem variations of keyword. The page may contain keyword itself few times or not at all.

SEO "Do's" and "Don'ts"

A hard look at results slaughters a number of SEO bugbears and sacred cows.

PageRank. The median PageRank was 4. One page had a PageRank of 0. Of course, this might simply be yet another demonstration that little PageRank number you get in your browser window is not what Google's algo is using. But if you're one of those people who attaches an overriding value to that little number, this is food for thought.