Body Piercing, Is There Anything Wrong With It?

Written by David Kunstek


When you spend a day atrepparttar mall, you see people with body piercings. Perhaps you see someone with a nose ring. Another may have a belly button ring. In fact, you may see people with some really crazy body piercing. Is there any reason that people should not have so many body piercings? When it all comes down to it, it is everyone's separate decision to be made, but we must ask, is there anything wrong with it, really?


Body piercing is popular, especially among teens. Something that once started as earrings led torepparttar 110265 piercing of many other body parts. Do you have your ears pierced? Is there something wrong with people who have their ears pierced? Many teens find body piercing to be a way of self expression and a way to rebel. Today, people get their noses, tongues, eye brows, belly buttons and even other places pierced. You can go into any jewelry store atrepparttar 110266 mall and find belly button and eye brow rings. The jewelry itself is not tacky or ugly, but can be very regular pieces. So, what makes body piercing so bad, then?

You're the one in charge...

Written by Terry Dashner


You’rerepparttar one in charge…

Terry Dashner…………Faith Fellowship Church PO Box 1586 Broken Arrow, OK 74013

His name was Samuel Adams. And he was a fiery soul. His daddy knew beer, but Samuel had no taste for it—the business end of it. Samuel held a masters degree in liberal arts from Harvard. He was no dummy, butrepparttar 110264 brewery business was not his cup of tea (or mug of beer). He failed in business, but he excelled in politics—to each man his call.

He was defiant toward British colonial rule and never passed up an opportunity to express his disdain for British Parliament. Listen torepparttar 110265 words of this brave man and founding father as he spoke to a large crowd that had gathered onrepparttar 110266 steps ofrepparttar 110267 Philadelphia Statehouse on August 1st 1776. The words he delivered came one day beforerepparttar 110268 signing ofrepparttar 110269 Declaration of Independence. Declared Adams, “We have exploredrepparttar 110270 temple of royalty and found thatrepparttar 110271 idol we have bowed down to has eyes which see not, ears that hear not our prayers, and a heart likerepparttar 110272 nether millstone.” He give his closing remarks by saying, “We have this day restoredrepparttar 110273 Sovereign, to whom alone all men ought to be obedient. He reigns in Heaven and with a propitious eye beholds his subjects assuming that freedom of thought and dignity of self-direction which he bestowed upon them. Fromrepparttar 110274 rising torepparttar 110275 setting sun, may His kingdom come.”

Wow! That’s bold speech. Keep in mind it was directed againstrepparttar 110276 British monarchy. Did he mean what he said or was he merely bucking for political gain? History tells us that he meant every word. Why? Because to speak this type of rhetoric merely in jest was certain death. Adams, as well asrepparttar 110277 other founding fathers, spoke knowing full wellrepparttar 110278 consequences—not censor but death. But to them speaking revolutionary rhetoric against England for freedom’s sake was worthrepparttar 110279 risk.

His name is Natan Sharansky. His book is entitled, The Case for Democracy: The Power of Freedom to Overcome Tyranny and Terror (Public Affairs 2004). He is a former Soviet dissident who has devoted his life torepparttar 110280 cause of freedom and democracy. Sharansky spent nine years in a Soviet prison duringrepparttar 110281 Cold War and was awardedrepparttar 110282 Congressional Gold Medal for his courageous struggle against tyranny behindrepparttar 110283 Iron Curtain. Sincerepparttar 110284 fall ofrepparttar 110285 Soviet Union, Sharansky has been an author, human rights activist, and a politician in Israel, serving in numerous positions including deputy prime minister.

Sharansky is a fiery brand also. Most people who create change are. He doesn’t mince words in his book. He tells it like it is. He declares that human rights and democracy go hand in hand. He says thatrepparttar 110286 world can be divided into either free societies or fear societies. The fear societies always implode, whereas, free societies—though they are far from perfect—always win out over tyranny and terror. Fear societies can not compete with free societies. This is interesting.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use