Ben Franklin Didn't Quite Get it Right

Written by Terry Mitchell


When Ben Franklin said "a penny saved is a penny earned", he didn't quite get it right. Actually, a penny saved is worth more than a penny earned. Do you find this statement shocking? I am about to prove to you that what I'm saying is true. Most people erroneously believerepparttar best way to strengthen their financial health is to increase their income. Onrepparttar 112211 contrary, saving money by cutting costs will get you there quicker. You see, it's very simple. When your income increases (with some exceptions likerepparttar 112212 part of it you put into your 401k), that extra money is taxed. Onrepparttar 112213 other hand, any amount you save by cutting costs is not taxed. Therefore, $20 saved by cutting costs is worth more than a $20 increase in income. The following (although over-simplified) example will illustrate this principle. Let's suppose that Jack and Cindy have identical jobs and incomes. Let's also suppose

Avoiding Double Taxation

Written by Peter F. Baigent CFP, CLU, CHFC, RFP.


Many people who buy mutual funds and other stocks often end up paying tax twice when they finally sellrepparttar security. This is because they do not keep track of their "average cost base" per share. This problem is very prevalent on investments whenrepparttar 112210 dividends have been reinvested inrepparttar 112211 same security. Most mutual fund investors reinvest their dividends in more shares ofrepparttar 112212 same fund. Many large corporations offer dividend reinvestment programmes that allowrepparttar 112213 shareholder to acquire more shares ofrepparttar 112214 corporation directly without any brokerage charges.

While reinvestment of dividends is usually an excellent idea, it does require some record keeping on your part to avoid double taxation. Many financial planning firms provide this tracking as part of their service. In my experience almost every case that I have looked at after a sale, has resulted inrepparttar 112215 reinvestment of dividends not being accounted for.

For example, let's say you bought units or shares in XYZ mutual fund in 1990 for $ 10,000 whenrepparttar 112216 shares were $5 each. So you got 2000 shares. Atrepparttar 112217 end ofrepparttar 112218 year,repparttar 112219 fund will declare a dividend equal torepparttar 112220 total of its realized capital gains, dividend and interest income etc. lessrepparttar 112221 fund's expenses. Let's say this dividend worked out to 30 cents per share. On 2000 shares that is a $600 dividend or 120 more shares ifrepparttar 112222 unit value hasn't changed since you bought intorepparttar 112223 fund.

You will receive a T3 slip in March for that dividend whether you take cash or additional shares for it. If it is a mutual fund corporation you will receive a T5 slip forrepparttar 112224 dividend declared at its fiscal year end. The tax effect isrepparttar 112225 same. The point to understand here is that you will be paying taxes that year on that dividend whether you receive it or not. If you reinvestrepparttar 112226 dividend in more ofrepparttar 112227 same shares, for tax purposesrepparttar 112228 "average cost per share" has now risen by 30 cents per share. Your total investment is now $10,600 (2120*5.00) from an income tax point of view because you will already have been taxed inrepparttar 112229 current year forrepparttar 112230 $600.

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use