Are You Targeting The Wrong Keywords?

Written by Kalena Jordan


A colleague asked me recently to namerepparttar most critical element of any search engine optimization campaign. I didnít hesitate to respond "keyword selection".

Like it or not,repparttar 128170 keywords and phrases you select to describe your site within your META tags and body text can make or break your listings inrepparttar 128171 search engines. Itís a sad fact that most companies are targetingrepparttar 128172 wrong keywords and losing traffic as a result.

Even sites that have excellent rankings will not benefit if those rankings are for unsuitable keywords. Let me give you an example:

A few months ago, we had an Australian client who wanted us to implement an optimization campaign to improve their search engine rankings, but without jeopardising existing rankings they had achieved for two particular search phrases: "Internet solutions Australia" and "online banking solutions".

Can you guess what products and services this company sells? The search phrases donít really give much away do they? In fact, this company is a distributor of web site design software that is specifically tailored for banks. Now ask yourself this: if you were a bank looking for this companyís products, would you have typed in either ofrepparttar 128173 phrases above to find their site? I doubt it. You would type in something more logical like "web site design software" or "web sites for banks" right?

This company was clearly targetingrepparttar 128174 wrong keywords and phrases. Their top ten rankings for these phrases were irrelevant, because nobody was searching for these phrases in relation torepparttar 128175 products this company was offering. The phrases they had chosen are what I call "jargonized", that is, they are filled with industry jargon and buzz words. Take "Internet solutions" as an example. Such jargon has found its way into our language withrepparttar 128176 onset ofrepparttar 128177 digital age and is bandied around boardrooms and marketing departments everywhere. Howeverrepparttar 128178 definition of this phrase is very broad and could be used to describe anything from a dial-up connection to a web site itself. Itís not a logical choice for searchers and is therefore useless as a key phrase to target.

LOOKs Can Be Deceiving

Written by Kalena Jordan


You may have heard that Looksmart Ltd have made some changes to their business model lately. In fact, Looksmart have maderepparttar profit-driven decision to move Looksmart.com from a Paid Submission based directory to a Pay Per Click based directory. The first warning shot was fired on April 3rd, with an email to existing Looksmart customers announcingrepparttar 128169 impending launch of Small Business Listings: "Based on feedback from customers like you, we've merged and enhancedrepparttar 128170 benefits of our 'Submit' and 'Site Promote' products into one product called Small Business Listings." Hmm... we thought, smells like pay per click. Discussion boards and forums worldwide were rife with rumours, complaints and concerns. Feedback? What feedback? Nobody put their hand up to say they had asked for a PPC model. Next came machine gun fire inrepparttar 128171 form of an email sent to existing Looksmart customers on April 12th: "LookSmart has launched Small Business Listings, our first pay-per-click product for small businesses. This new, improved product replaces both Submit and Site Promote... Your account has already been updated and is ready for you to log in. We've waivedrepparttar 128172 $49 per listing set-up fee. We'll give you $300 in free clicks per listing. Each month forrepparttar 128173 next 20 months you'll receive a $15 credit per listing in your account - starting today." [I should take a moment to point out that currently, these changes apply to Looksmart.com only, not regional directory versions]. Meanwhile, new customers were asked to pay a $49 "set-up" fee and an initial account deposit of at least $150 towards future clicks. Existing Express Submit customers who paidrepparttar 128174 $199 or $299 one-time submission fee discovered they were only entitled to a maximum of 100 clicks per month instead ofrepparttar 128175 unlimited number of clicks they were receiving underrepparttar 128176 old model. Ouch. What's more, Looksmart demanded that these customers log-in and "activate" their accounts by July 11th (by entering their credit card details) in order to receive their "free" clicks. All types of conflicting assumptions and questions began appearing onrepparttar 128177 forums and discussion boards. "What happens if I don't activate my account?", "Will existing listings stayrepparttar 128178 same if you do nothing?", "Will my site be dropped if I don't activate", "What happens to my Looksmart listings on MSN?". So confusing and misleading wasrepparttar 128179 announcement from Looksmart that some people thought they were getting a huge bargain while others believed they were getting ripped off big time. To make matters worse,repparttar 128180 Terms of Service and FAQ's forrepparttar 128181 new Small Business Listings onrepparttar 128182 Looksmart site seemed to show conflicting information that changed each day we looked. But it took a couple of days forrepparttar 128183 true deception to sink in. Once people began to log in and activate their accounts, it wasn't long before they started receiving "Listing Traffic Interruption" emails from Looksmart announcing their sites had already receivedrepparttar 128184 100 "free" clicks allocated as part ofrepparttar 128185 new deal and would consequently receive no more traffic for that month, unless they increased their monthly budget (in other words, agree to pay $0.15 per click for all additional visitors that month). One of my colleagues received this email within 8 hours of activating his account, which meant that he was previously receiving more than 300 clicks per DAY, let alonerepparttar 128186 oh so generous 100 clicks per month that Looksmart were offering him as part ofrepparttar 128187 new deal. He worked out that he would need to add an additional $1,300 to his account each month, just to maintainrepparttar 128188 level of traffic Looksmart were providing him underrepparttar 128189 old system! Upgrade? I think not! Here are some interesting tid-bits I've discovered aboutrepparttar 128190 new model: - Unlike regular Pay Per Click models such as Overture.com, Looksmart are not giving customers control over their bid amounts and also providing no way to regularly update their listing description without paying $49 each time forrepparttar 128191 privilege.

- Sites previously receiving an unlimited number of clicks per year viarepparttar 128192 old system are now restricted to 1,200 clicks per year, unless they fork over more money. - The new system has a $15 per month minimum spend requirement. This means that if a listing fails to generate $15 worth of click revenue for LookSmart in a particular month,repparttar 128193 site will still be billed for that entire amount

Cont'd on page 2 ==>
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use