Wanted: Perfect LawyersWritten by Mart Gil Abareta
Continued from page 1
Therefore, in instances where you are being bothered by a certain problem that you cannot resolve by yourself, it will certainly never take less of you as a person to consult a legal expert. Remember that it’s always better to look for a lawyer sooner than later. After all, these lawyers also need time to prepare before deadlines sneak up. After finding one, you’ll soon realize that it’s a lot easier to take a rest after talking to an experienced attorney. Indeed, people can avail services of these lawyers for legal advice in almost all kinds of situations. So, if you aren’t sure of what your legal rights are, now can be best time for you to obtain an attorney to evaluate your situation. Because even if you can get through a legal problem without aid of a legal specialist, you must always keep in mind that it’s still better to find someone who can represent you in your search for truth and justice.

For comments and questions about the article, you may visit http://www.mesrianilaw.com
| | Supreme Court Decides Against Grokster In File Sharing DecisionWritten by Richard A. Chapo
Continued from page 1
Writing opinion, Justice Souter explained: "There is no evidence that Grokster…made an effort to filter copyrighted material from users' downloads or otherwise impede sharing of copyrighted files," He further explained, "The company showed itself to be aiming to satisfy a known source of demand for copyright infringement, market comprising former Napster users." No Nail In The Coffin The entertainment industry is trumpeting end of file sharing. This ruling is no such thing. To understand impact of ruling, a brief discussion of legal procedure is necessary. The Supreme Court decision does not find Grokster liable for anything. Instead, it simply reverses a lower court ruling that Grokster could not possibly be found liable. As a result, case will return to trial court and eventually go to trial. In trial, Plaintiff will have to prove that Grokster distributed file-sharing software with intent that it be used for copyright infringement. Proving such a case will not be easy since “intent” is a vague concept. In Closing The decision of Supreme Court provides entertainment industry with a basis for pursuing file sharing companies. Is file sharing at an end? Not likely.

Richard Chapo is with SanDiegoBusinessLawFirm.com - providing San Diego businesses with legal services. This article is for general education purposes. Nothing in this article creates an attorney-client relationship.
|