Continued from page 1
Iberia became home to many Milesians and I believe these were Iberians from
Caspian Iberia which has a capital called Tiflis, now. Clearly many Kelts went back to Ireland and Britain from even before
Hyksos period as
Beaker people in 2200 BC. and it appears that many more came in 1500 BC. Was
Trojan War just an extension of
Hyksos wars? Troy III was called Aa-Mu and
Phoenician Brotherhood may well have included remnants of Harappa and Mu (SE Asia?). Pythagoras had a Phoenician parent, but by this time
Brotherhood seems to have been split into many factions. He went against
Sybarites as we know and they were allied with
Etruscans who were allied with Carthage against
Phocaean/Milesians or Iberians who seemed separate from their Venetii Keltic 'brothers'. Yet
Venetii weren't against
Kelts or Bruttii when they came to get rid of
Tarquin lineage of Etruscans and Rome became a reality. We will cover this a great deal more under
‘mystery’ of
Battle of Alalia.
Numerous Greek states seem to have been allied at Naucratis as we showed and it would be logical to assume they were Hyksos/Phoenician a century before. Thus we end up with having to say there was no Greece and that historians are talking about a continuous or corporate entity that seldom (if ever) existed. Pythagoras seems to have had a strong spiritual leaning in his Crotonite followers that were allied with
syncretic hermetic cults,
Therapeutae of Jesus, Heliopolis and later Alexandria's Gnostics. We would have to say
Cathar ecumenicism may have a root in these groups and that certain groups of Jews and Islamic people (Sufis) were still able to get along for centuries to come. In
final analysis (at this point) we should simply say
battle of ideas continued after
all out battles ended. The pirates and corporate enterprises were seeking marriages and elites became stronger from 2,000 BC. to
time of Jesus. Rather than covering these wars and empires from a Parthian or Hittite and Egyptian perspective we hope
business and theological associations are instructive. It is also necessary to understand
financial import of
American trade that Phoenicians seem to have maintained. Maybe a settlement of sorts was reached where certain enterprises in Greece and Anatolia left
Iberian-Punic interests to control
American trade and they took
Mediterranean in places where
Phoenicians could no longer exercise adequate control.
TROY: - There is good reason to believe this area and Smyrna was inhabited with advanced cultures as far back as 9,000 BC. and Catal Huyuk's far less important but well preserved site makes one think it would have taken even longer to leave
coast and move inland to establish such an advanced culture in 7,500 BC. Clearly seacoasts had a lot of defensive and trading benefits and there would only be a need to move inland when all
land was spoken for on
rivers running to
Sea.
Troy VIIa seems to have been
site Schliemann claimed to have found all by himself. We will see he did play an important part in showing established archaeology should listen to legend but that he was not all he wanted us to believe either, in this brief forward by Mr. Fagan.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a325e/a325e50b25ac0e7ae6f1b43223ab8214c39dd303" alt=""
Author of Diverse Druids Columnist for The ES Press Magazzine Guest 'expert' at World-Mysteries.com