Continued from page 1
And to tell you
truth, I think I might be getting off easy (no pun intended, I assure you). I do not host web cams at my site. The reason I mention that is, get this: owner-operators of web cam sites are now required to record and retain, as a file, all live sessions in
spirit of keeping with
law. We’re talking terabytes (and no, that’s not
name of a new porn star) of information storage within
scope of one or two months for
proto-typical site. That web cam site is going to cost a small fortune in extra hosting quotas.
Now a lot of rational-minded legal folk think that there’s no way that this new interpretation of
law will weather judiciary appeal.
That being said, my gripe with
law, is not
source of my uneasiness. The “bad feeling” stems from
fact that I don’t expect this statute, as it pertains to
average webmaster, to be thrown out or even reasonably modified. Lately, there just seems to be a rash of adult-unfriendly (and Free Speech-assaulting, mind you) bills and decisions that have passed in state and local legislatures all around
country; decisions you wouldn’t have expected to have gone
way that they eventually did:
1. The decision to uphold
ban on
sale of sextoys in
states of Alabama, Texas, and Georgia. 2. The passing of
watered-down-yet-still-onerous version of
original Missouri bill SB 32. 3. The sudden closing of a legal loophole by a New York Appellate Division court; an act that will imminently and without warning shut down a ton of Big Apple adult businesses unless it is repealed.
It seems
Bush administration, with U.S. Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales prominently in
foreground, is truly waging a war on pornography. Let’s hope that this war comes to a better resolution than
one in Iraq, so far…(I’m sorry, I couldn’t resist. :-))

The author is affiliated with Sex-Toys-Videos.com, and writes regular porn and sex toy articles for his blog page.