Continued from page 1
Knowledge Moves. Strathern (2004) points out that knowledge moves by virtue of being embedded within
objects that it is used to create. Therefore, for example,
price of buying a computer includes not only
metal and plastic box that you look at, but also
price of
research and development that went into creating it. This is also extensible to
creation of knowledge in
scientific community. Embedded into any scientific paper is not only
immediate knowledge that it purports to show, but also
information contained in
papers that were used to produce
hypothesis on which it is based. We can return to
work of Latour for a clearer example of how information changes as it shifts location. In Pandora’s Hope (1999) he describes a field trip by a group of scientists to
Amazon, designed to investigate a botanical mystery at
edge of
rainforest. Several small trees that usually grow only in
savannah around
forest had been found a few metres inside
wood, and there was some debate as to whether this was a sign that
forest was advancing (the tree was a scout) or retreating (the tree was left over by a shrinking forest). Latour traces
plot of a group of soil samples from their position at
edge of
Amazonian jungle to their eventual resting place in
academic literature. From
ground, a sample is moved to a pedocomparator (a briefcase-sized grid) whereby it can be compared to other samples. Then via a process of inscription
same soil sample becomes a figure in a chart. Latour likens
process to a movement from ‘thing’ to ‘sign’. Once
soil sample has ‘become’ a sign, it can be transmitted and reproduced with ease (ibid 1999: 54). Information then, is transformed as it moves through both time and space. Latour and Woolgar’s ethnography demonstrates that as historical information (in
form of facts) is used by people it becomes part of something else, a new ‘fact’, in
present day. Tsoukas points out that
individual is a rich source of data which almost immediately becomes decontextualised and readily moved about. As it moves, information takes on new meanings dependent on
situation it is used in and
person that is using it.
Notes
[1]International Classification of Diseases Revision 10. This is used be hospitals to classify patients according to
illness, disease or accident that they are admitted for. [2]Commonly used tests include
standard gamble, feeling thermometer and time trade-off techniques. The Health Technology Assessment Programme has published a review of all of these measures (see references).
References
American Accounting Association. A Statement of Basic Accounting Theory. 1966; Sarasota, Florida: American Accounting Association.
Bachelard G. Le Materialisme Rationnel. 1953; Paris, PUF.
Brazier J, Deverill M, Green C et al. A Review of
Use of Health Status Measures in Economic Evaluation. Health Technology Assessment 1999; 3: 9.
Hyland ME. Quality-of-Life Measures as Providers of Information on Value-for-Money of Health Interventions – Comparisons and Recommendations for Practice. Pharmacoeconomics 1997; 11 (1): 19-31.
Latour B. Pandora’s Hope - Essays on
Reality of Science Studies. 1999; London, Harvard University Press.
Latour B and Woolgar S. Laboratory Life - The Construction of Scientific Facts. 1979; New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
Power M. Making Things Auditable. Accounting, Organisations and Society 1996; 21 (2/3): 289-315.
Power M. The Audit Society – Rituals of Verification. 1997; Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Strathern M. Commons and Borderlands - Working Papers on Interdisciplinarity, Accountability and
Flow of Knowledge. 2004; Oxon, Sean King Publishing.
Tzoukas H. The Tyranny of Light - The Temptations
and Paradoxes of
Information Society. Futures 1997; 9: 827-843.

Jack Boulton is the editor of Stimulus Respond, the E-Zine for Urban Anthropologists (www.stimulusrespond.com). You may reproduce this article with permission (obtained by emailing jack@stimulusrespond.com) and on the condition that the author is credited along with a link to Stimulus Respond.