We covered how ancients used spalling to get ores from rock in this book. Spalling would likely have lead to smelting due to different metals being present in ores these people were after. We also know that certain very hard woods produce high heats and when fires are used in caves or cenotes open to prevailing winds it produces a bellows effect. Here is a little about one metal that when present in an ore reduces melting point of gold to approximately half of its normal melting point of 1064 degrees Celsius. “There is a 22 ct yellow gold solder with a very low melting point. {We know that Greek gold used cadmium to affect lower melting point.} This has composition 92.5 % gold - 6.0% germanium -1.5% silicon and is based on ternary eutectic system. The soldering temperature is 425-450°C and although joints are initially whitish in colour they can be heat treated for 2 hours at 285°C to give a good colour match to yellow gold.” (13) REQUIRED ANALYSIS: 1. How were artifacts made? How were symbols of minute and microscopic nature put on and into artifacts? POSSIBILITIES: a) Harmonic drills b) Diamond drills (seems unlikely due to small size) c) Shamanic attunement causing lattices of matter to reflect specific designs akin to what one might see in Crop Circle formation. 2. Is there a development of technology over time which is demonstrated? a) Is this technology mirrored in Iowa and which one is earliest? b) What other regions of world might have similar artifacts or designs including Cretan bull we see. Will there be knowledge on Luwian script found at 2200 feet below Gulf of Mexico to tie these things together with Carolina Bays event in 8350 BCE? 3. What was purpose of artisans or shamans? Is Orisha or Yoruba possession by demons a real thing or is it a sorcerer and his psychic possession that is involved? How many witnesses to a ritual are affected and can one shaman possess many people simultaneously? a) My personal experiences with exorcisms and possessions as well as work of Robert Bruce and others who might be asked to attune to artifacts in ritual. b) Could minute symbols include information that can be tapped through harmonics? ACTION PLAN: 1. Contact and begin process of informing experts in anthropology, archaeology, chemistry (bonding and lattices or Materials Scientists like Robins and Tiller) psychology and physics about possibilities these artifacts may portend. 2. Select one institution or expert to make an appraisal of work done in my book that addresses ‘who’ and ‘when’ in general terms. Maybe this person or institution will eventually seek to be dig team managers and owners of site. Could mining companies and investment firms be interested if government funded institutions find it ‘too political’? 3. Try to get a ball park on date of electrum for purposes of focusing our efforts. 4. Get archaeological ball park on lithics if possible. If we are dealing with huge time frames due to electrum being smelted (uncertain at present) then we will have a lot more research to do on ‘who’ or what culture(s) were involved. 5. Consider auction houses and media at junctures which might move process along.

Heads again! Three in a row! That’s 12.5% chance given traditional views of probability. About 1/10, pretty lucky I guess, but not exceptionally improbable...

Next toss. Four heads in a row would be pretty unlikely, 6.25% chance, taking into account irrefutable laws of probability. Your confidence in this coin toss is not high at all... This time, it must be tails!

You toss again... Doh! Tails... told you! It’s just random.

But what if no-one had ever told you about probability? What if at schools, pupils were taught that nothing was random, but was merely configured by consensus of conscious minds observing it, based upon their beliefs on outcome?

Would those children, upon reaching adulthood, be able to toss a coin 1000 times and it come up heads every single time?

Maybe, maybe not. But my point is that seemingly provable scientific experiments may have their results contaminated by belief of persons doing experimentation.

If scientists believe that they are unable to influence probability, then results they will glean will support this belief, whether that is because they are right, or because they are wrong but believe they are right.

Imagine if everybody in country put same numbers on lottery, and watched draw convinced “I’m going to win this week I can feel it!”

Would chances of those numbers coming out still be millions to one?

Maybe, maybe not.

But then again, scientists will freely accept that quantum particles can be influenced merely by our observations and expectations. So why not visible matter constructed of these quantum particles? Because its easier for them to accept strange goings-on with an invisible sub-atomic particle than it is with something they can see, feel, taste, and touch like a coin or a dice. If they don’t see anything that supports this belief, they will not believe it. But if belief is what makes it happen, then they are never going to see it in experimentation.

If belief is key to defining our reality, then while we retain a steadfast and narrow belief system, be that religion, science, or a combination of two, then we are severely narrowing possibilities open to us in this reality. We need to reset our brains back to zero. View everything from “provable” and “observable” science to religious or spiritual philosophies as a child would, from a neutral place where you can freely explore them as possibilities, but be in a place where you can also explore other conflicting areas of possibility without contaminating them, or rendering them invisible, with your own preconceptions.

If you get in to a reality too deeply, you will believe in that reality to point where you will automatically dismiss any other reality presented to you... this is dangerous, especially when you consider that reality you are part of may have been devised with a malevolent intent.

http://www.johnnyfuctup.com

Johnny Fuctup looks at everything from a neutral point. Breaking down rigid belief systems and being open to many alternative possibilities of reality is paramount to understanding the universe we live in, and also to assuring that we are not being maniuplated into buying into a bogus belief system, be that religions or sciences.