The Dismal Mind - Economics as a Pretension to Science - Part II

Written by Sam Vaknin


Continued from page 1

Narratives in economics offer an organizing principle, a sense of order and ensuing justice, of an inexorable drive toward well defined (though, perhaps, hidden) goals,repparttar ubiquity of meaning, being part of a whole. They strive to answerrepparttar 132661 "why’s" and "how’s". They are dialogic and prescriptive (=provide behavioural prescriptions). The client (let's say, a politician) asks: "Why am I (and here follows an economic problem or behaviour". Then,repparttar 132662 narrative is spun: "The situation is like this not becauserepparttar 132663 world is whimsically cruel but because...and if you were to do this or thatrepparttar 132664 situation is bound to improve". The client is calmed byrepparttar 132665 very fact that there is an explanation to that which until now bothered him, that there is hope and - providing he followsrepparttar 132666 prescriptions - he cannot be held responsible for a possible failure, that there is who or what to blame (focussing diffused anger is a very policy instrument) and, that, therefore, his belief in order, justice and their administration by some supreme, transcendental principle is restored. This sense of "law and order" is further enhanced whenrepparttar 132667 narrative yields predictions which come true (either because they are self-fulfilling or because some real "law"- really, a pattern - has been discovered).

IV. Current Problems in Economics

Neo-classical economics has failed on several fronts simultaneously. This multiple failure led to despair andrepparttar 132668 re-examination of basic percepts and tenets:

1. The Treatment of Government

Government was accorded a special status and special treatment in economic theory (unlike other actors and agents). It was alternatively cast as a saint (seeking to selflessly maximize social welfare) - or asrepparttar 132669 villain (seeking to perpetuate and increase its power ruthlessly, as in public choice theories). Both views are caricatures of reality. Governments do seek to perpetuate and increase power but they use it mostly to redistribute income and not for self-enrichment.

2. Technology and Innovation

Economics failed to account forrepparttar 132670 role of innovation in growth and development. It also ignoredrepparttar 132671 specific nature of knowledge industries (where returns increase rather than diminish and network effects prevail). Thus, current economic thinking is woefully inadequate to deal with information monopolies (such as Microsoft), path dependence and pervasive externalities.

3. Long Term Investment Horizons

Classic cost/benefit analyses fail to tackle very long term investment horizons (periods). Their underlying assumption (the opportunity cost of delayed consumption) fails beyondrepparttar 132672 investor's useful economic life expectancy. Put more plainly: investors care less about their grandchildren's future than about their own. This is because predictions concerned withrepparttar 132673 far future are highly uncertain and people refuse to base current decisions on fuzzy "what ifs". This is a problem because many current investments (example:repparttar 132674 fight against global warming) are likely to yield results only inrepparttar 132675 decades ahead. There is no effective method of cost/benefit analysis applicable to such time horizons.

(continued)

Sam Vaknin is the author of Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited and After the Rain - How the West Lost the East. He is a columnist for Central Europe Review, United Press International (UPI) and eBookWeb and the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open Directory, Suite101 and searcheurope.com.

Visit Sam's Web site at http://samvak.tripod.com




The Distributive Justice of the Market - Part I

Written by Sam Vaknin


Continued from page 1

In a "Theory of Justice" (published 1971, p. 302), John Rawls described an ideal society thus:

"(1) Each person is to have an equal right torepparttar most extensive total system of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar system of liberty for all. (2) Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both: (a) torepparttar 132659 greatest benefit ofrepparttar 132660 least advantaged, consistent withrepparttar 132661 just savings principle, and (b) attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity."

It all harks back to scarcity of resources - land, money, raw materials, manpower, creative brains. Those who can afford to do so, hoard resources to offset anxiety regarding future uncertainty. Others wallow in paucity. The distribution of means is thus skewed. "Distributive justice" deals withrepparttar 132662 just allocation of scarce resources.

Yet, evenrepparttar 132663 basic terminology is somewhat fuzzy. What constitutes a resource? what is meant by allocation? Who should allocate resources - Adam Smith's "invisible hand",repparttar 132664 government,repparttar 132665 consumer, or business? Should it reflect differences in power, in intelligence, in knowledge, or in heredity? Should resource allocation be subject to a principle of entitlement? Is it reasonable to demand that it be just - or merely efficient? Are justice and efficiency antonyms?

Justice is concerned with equal access to opportunities. Equal access does not guarantee equal outcomes, invariably determined by idiosyncrasies and differences between people. Access leveraged byrepparttar 132666 application of natural or acquired capacities - translates into accrued wealth. Disparities in these capacities lead to discrepancies in accrued wealth.

The doctrine of equal access is founded onrepparttar 132667 equivalence of Men. That all men are created equal and deserverepparttar 132668 same respect and, therefore, equal treatment is not self evident. European aristocracy well into this century would have probably found this notion abhorrent. Jose Ortega Y Gasset, writing inrepparttar 132669 1930's, preached that access to educational and economic opportunities should be premised on one's lineage, up bringing, wealth, and social responsibilities.

A succession of societies and cultures discriminated againstrepparttar 132670 ignorant, criminals, atheists, females, homosexuals, members of ethnic, religious, or racial groups,repparttar 132671 old,repparttar 132672 immigrant, andrepparttar 132673 poor. Communism - ostensibly a strict egalitarian idea - foundered because it failed to reconcile strict equality with economic and psychological realities within an impatient timetable.

(continued)

Sam Vaknin is the author of Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited and After the Rain - How the West Lost the East. He is a columnist for Central Europe Review, United Press International (UPI) and eBookWeb and the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open Directory, Suite101 and searcheurope.com.

Visit Sam's Web site at http://samvak.tripod.com




    <Back to Page 1
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use