The 25 Fallacies of President Bush's State of the Union Address on Terrorism ( Part 1 )

Written by Arthur Zulu


Continued from page 1

Fallacy 7. "The United States and our allies are determined. We refuse to live inrepparttar shadows of this ultimate danger." Right? Wrong! We must continue to live inrepparttar 126001 shadows ofrepparttar 126002 terrorists. This is because terrorism is as old asrepparttar 126003 history of man on this planet—6,000 years. We have never left its shadows. Rather, terrorism continues to increase withrepparttar 126004 passing ofrepparttar 126005 day. It is no wonder that Time Magazine remarks: "Determining whetherrepparttar 126006 West is gaining inrepparttar 126007 fight against terrorism requires interpreting shadowy, shapeless data. Yet this much can be safely said: international terrorism existed long before 9/11 and will continue long after that."

This isrepparttar 126008 message of my published book, CHASING SHADOWS!: A Dream. (A book that revealsrepparttar 126009 terrorists' master plan to finally setrepparttar 126010 world on fire! ) Terrorism starts fromrepparttar 126011 heart and mind, and this is fueled byrepparttar 126012 hypocrisy and double standard in this world—two things that are not in a hurry to go away. In this regard, killings and destruction will exacerbate, rather than stop terrorism. When willrepparttar 126013 world addressrepparttar 126014 issues that cause this evil, instead of chasing shadows?

Fallacy 8. "The first to see our determination wererepparttar 126015 Taliban, who made Afganistanrepparttar 126016 primary training base of al-Qaida killers. As of this month, that free country has a new constitution, guaranteeing free election and full participation by women." Afganistan is not a free nation. Terrorist attacks and bombings arerepparttar 126017 order ofrepparttar 126018 day—signifying thatrepparttar 126019 Taliban and al-Qaeda are back. Warlords are also doing their thing. The only ‘free' place in Afganistan isrepparttar 126020 capital Kabul. Some Afgans even long forrepparttar 126021 return ofrepparttar 126022 Taliban because of security concerns. Democracy itself is not an insurance against terrorism—some ‘democrats' are known to terrorize their subjects. Ask Zimbabweans.

Fallacy 9. "Since we last met in this chamber, combat forces ofrepparttar 126023 United States, Great Britain, Austrialia, Poland and other countries enforcedrepparttar 126024 demands ofrepparttar 126025 United Nations, endedrepparttar 126026 rule of Saddam Hussein—andrepparttar 126027 people of Iraq are free." The U.N. did not send any country to invade Iraq and change its regime. It was a unilateral action, a pre-emptive war, which itself is a weapon of mass destruction. Says Nancy Pelosi: "But evenrepparttar 126028 most powerful nation in history must bring other nations to our side to meet common dangers. The President's policies do not reflect that. He has pursued a go-it-alone foreign policy that leaves us isolated abroad and that stealsrepparttar 126029 resources we need for education and health care here at home."

The Iraqi government was toppled onrepparttar 126030 excuse that it possessed dangerous weapons that could sinkrepparttar 126031 world in 45 minutes. (Sorry, Lord Hutton has cleared British Prime Minister Tony Blair, for sexing uprepparttar 126032 report on Iraq. Let's blamerepparttar 126033 BBC.) But about a year afterrepparttar 126034 invasion andrepparttar 126035 collateral damage of Iraq—and after a thorough search ofrepparttar 126036 deserts and tunnels in that country, no such weapons have been found! Again inrepparttar 126037 words of Nancy Pelosi: "The President led us intorepparttar 126038 Iraqi war onrepparttar 126039 basis of unproven assertions without evidence; he embraced a radical doctrine of pre-emptive war unprecedented in our history; and he failed to build a true international coalition."

Fallacy 10. "These killers, joined by foreign terrorists, are a serious, continuing danger. Yet we are making progress against them." This was in reference torepparttar 126040 American war in Iraq. The President did not mentionrepparttar 126041 over 500 American troops that have been killed andrepparttar 126042 thousands that are wounded. Nor did he mentionrepparttar 126043 scores of daily attacks against American soldiers, orrepparttar 126044 crashing planes. Is it progress when servicemen and women are killed or maimed? This reminds me ofrepparttar 126045 saying: winningrepparttar 126046 war is not winningrepparttar 126047 peace.

(To be concluded)

ARTHUR ZULU, an editor and book reviewer, isrepparttar 126048 controversial author ofrepparttar 126049 best-selling book, CHASING SHADOWS!: A Dream. (A book that revealsrepparttar 126050 terrorists' master plan to finally setrepparttar 126051 world on fire!)

For a copy ofrepparttar 126052 book and FREE excerpt, goto:

http://www.1stbooks.com/bookview/21013

For contacts, mailto:

mostcontroversialwriter@yahoo.com



ARTHUR ZULU, an editor and book reviewer, is the controversial author of the best-selling book, CHASING SHADOWS!: A Dream. (A book that reveals the terrorists' master plan to finally set the world on fire!)


How the Weapons Disappeared by George Bush

Written by Arthur Zulu


Continued from page 1

But Bush has another reason, if you are an unbeliever.

Third reason. ‘It might have been transported to other countries.’

This isrepparttar tag line. So Saddam carried those weapons to other countries undetected byrepparttar 126000 U.S. satellites and allrepparttar 126001 intelligence agents? Did he transport them by air, land, sea or through an underground tunnel? (Kudos to Saddam—the Arab born James Bond.)

If this story is true, thenrepparttar 126002 world is not safe yet. Becauserepparttar 126003 unnamed countries—multiple axis of evil—would userepparttar 126004 weapons to precipitate ‘Armageddon’ just when we think thatrepparttar 126005 danger has been averted. Or if they have good intentions, or if they do not know how to operate Iraqi missiles, they might just return these weapons torepparttar 126006 next democratic government in Iraq. And thenrepparttar 126007 circus continues.

Now away from fiction. Letrepparttar 126008 truth be told. Did Iraq have any weapons of mass destruction prior torepparttar 126009 invasion? No,repparttar 126010 UN inspectors said so. Andrepparttar 126011 former U.S. weapon chief, David Kay, also supports it. Then was Bush right in going to war? Though he tried to invent reasons to justifyrepparttar 126012 war inrepparttar 126013 interview, it must be said that there was no justification for it.

In my controversial book, CHASING SHADOWS!: A Dream; I wrote that we are fighting terror withrepparttar 126014 wrong weapons. What causes terrorism? Such senseless wars and other injustices arerepparttar 126015 root cause of this evil. So we are not solvingrepparttar 126016 problem, but fueling it.

And this world will fare badly….

ARTHUR ZULU, an editor and book reviewer, isrepparttar 126017 author ofrepparttar 126018 controversial book, CHASING SHADOWS!: A Dream. (A book that revealsrepparttar 126019 terrorists’ master plan to finally setrepparttar 126020 world on fire!)

For a copy ofrepparttar 126021 book and FREE excerpt, goto:

http://www.1stbooks.com/bookview/21013

For contacts, mailto:mostcontroversialwriter@yahoo.com



ARTHUR ZULU, an editor and book reviewer, is the author of the controversial book, CHASING SHADOWS!: A Dream. (A book that reveals the terrorists’ master plan to finally set the world on fire!)




    <Back to Page 1
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use