Superultramodern Science (SS) and The Millennium Problems in Mathematics

Written by Dr Kedar Joshi PBSSI MRI

Continued from page 1

2. Poincare Conjecture If we stretch a rubber band aroundrepparttar surface of an apple, then we can shrink it down to a point by moving it slowly, without tearing it and without allowing it to leaverepparttar 105809 surface. Onrepparttar 105810 other hand, if we imagine thatrepparttar 105811 same rubber band has somehow been stretched inrepparttar 105812 appropriate direction around a doughnut, then there is no way of shrinking it to a point without breaking eitherrepparttar 105813 rubber band orrepparttar 105814 doughnut. We sayrepparttar 105815 surface ofrepparttar 105816 apple is "simply connected," but thatrepparttar 105817 surface ofrepparttar 105818 doughnut is not. Poincaré, almost a hundred years ago, knew that a two dimensional sphere is essentially characterized by this property of simple connectivity, and askedrepparttar 105819 corresponding question forrepparttar 105820 three dimensional sphere (the set of points in four dimensional space at unit distance fromrepparttar 105821 origin). This question turned out to be extraordinarily difficult, and mathematicians have been struggling with it ever since.

SS solution : According torepparttar 105822 Joshian conjecture in Superultramdoern Science (SS), that space has 3 and only 3 spatial dimensions,repparttar 105823 concept of three dimensional sphere (and consequently Poincare conjecture itself) is absurd.

3. P vs NP Suppose that you are organizing housing accommodations for a group of four hundred university students. Space is limited and only one hundred ofrepparttar 105824 students will receive places inrepparttar 105825 dormitory. To complicate matters,repparttar 105826 Dean has provided you with a list of pairs of incompatible students, and requested that no pair from this list appear in your final choice. This is an example of what computer scientists call an NP-problem, since it is easy to check if a given choice of one hundred students proposed by a coworker is satisfactory (i.e., no pair from taken from your coworker's list also appears onrepparttar 105827 list fromrepparttar 105828 Dean's office), howeverrepparttar 105829 task of generating such a list from scratch seems to be so hard as to be completely impractical. Indeed,repparttar 105830 total number of ways of choosing one hundred students fromrepparttar 105831 four hundred applicants is greater thanrepparttar 105832 number of atoms inrepparttar 105833 known universe! Thus no future civilization could ever hope to build a supercomputer capable of solvingrepparttar 105834 problem by brute force; that is, by checking every possible combination of 100 students. However, this apparent difficulty may only reflectrepparttar 105835 lack of ingenuity of your programmer. In fact, one ofrepparttar 105836 outstanding problems in computer science is determining whether questions exist whose answer can be quickly checked, but which require an impossibly long time to solve by any direct procedure. Problems likerepparttar 105837 one listed above certainly seem to be of this kind, but so far no one has managed to prove that any of them really are so hard as they appear, i.e., that there really is no feasible way to generate an answer withrepparttar 105838 help of a computer. Stephen Cook and Leonid Levin formulatedrepparttar 105839 P (i.e., easy to find) versus NP (i.e., easy to check) problem independently in 1971.

SS solution : According torepparttar 105840 NSTP theory, one ofrepparttar 105841 major of components of SS, all problems which, in principle, have answers are, in fact, P problems. This implication is based onrepparttar 105842 idea ofrepparttar 105843 non - spatial superhuman computer that takes zero time to process information.

Creator of Superultramodern Science (SS)

Disproves God...

Written by Terry Dashner

Continued from page 1

“Likewise, belief in science does not contradict belief in miracles. Science studiesrepparttar way things usually work inrepparttar 105808 world, and it formulates laws to express these ways. Miracles are exceptions to these laws, but miracles presuppose these laws. If there were no scientific laws, there would be no sense in calling anything a miracle.

“Exceptions to a law do not disproverepparttar 105809 law. Supposerepparttar 105810 President pardons a criminal. The laws ofrepparttar 105811 court still hold, butrepparttar 105812 President adds something else from outside. The laws ofrepparttar 105813 court are likerepparttar 105814 laws of science, andrepparttar 105815 Presidential pardon is like a miracle.

“Suppose your employer gives you extra money for Christmas, over and above your paycheck. That does not disprove your contract, which tells you how much you usually get in your paycheck; it just adds to it. That is what a miracle does.

“If there is a God, there can be miracles. If there is no God, there can be no miracles, because there is no one who hasrepparttar 105816 supernatural power to do them.

“God createdrepparttar 105817 world by intelligent design. That is why science is possible. It is no accident that science arose inrepparttar 105818 West, which believed inrepparttar 105819 doctrine ofrepparttar 105820 Creation, not inrepparttar 105821 Orient, which did not. Most ofrepparttar 105822 great scientists in history have been Jews, Christians and Muslims, because these three religions believe thatrepparttar 105823 world is created, therefore intelligently designed, ordered. Science and religions are allies, not enemies.”

My friends, I can’t say it any better than that. That’s why I quoted Professor Kreeft heavily, word for word. Keeprepparttar 105824 faith. Stayrepparttar 105825 course. Jesus is coming soon. Allrepparttar 105826 signs of creation point to this fact.

Blessed, Pastor T.dash……..

A pastor.

    <Back to Page 1 © 2005
Terms of Use