Questions are then raised concerning future events. Let's look at a likely scenario. We know when al Qaeda has chosen a target in America, they persist until it is destroyed. World Trade Center 1993 and 2001. The national capitol 2001 and ? Security has tightened sufficiently so next attack on capitol will be different than last, as with Trade Center.

The report on Now demonstrates a close relationship between Pakistan and al Qaeda. Pakistan has growing nuclear capability and it is reasonable to assume al Qaeda has proved itself worthy to share in this capability. While it may be a bit more difficult to move nuclear devices within striking distance of capitol, it is far from impossible. Any number of nuclear weapons could be brought in with regular drug shipments, made possible by great war on drugs fraud.

The lesson of Waco, Texas and Ruby Ridge, Idaho was to fear government's ability to make war on people. The lesson of Oklahoma City and September 11, is that government can’t or won't protect people or itself. Fear increases all around and affects every aspect of American life. That fear not only allows an expansion of government and government power, it demands increase as national security.

The escape of 8,000 al Qaeda in 2001 does nothing to increase security anywhere. Anything President has said about national security since November, 2001 is suspect. There is no doubt national government is growing like a cancer. Yet, if al Qaeda succeeds in destroying capitol, especially a nuclear destruction, would any American see it as a successful radiation treatment? Can surviving America rest easier because capitol was target and not rest of us? Will Congress deserve such a fate because it did nothing when President substantially decreased entire national security?

As I write this, I have heard reports that U.S. forces are closing in on al Qaeda near Pakistani border. Will they capture or kill 8,000 freed in November, 2001? Or will most of them slip away with Pakistani assistance? The answer to this question should tell us much about so called war on terrorism. Personally, I expect it to be business as usual and hope I am wrong.

To add some balance to all this, I want to point out that we could consider escape of November, 2001 a case of a Christian President loving his enemies, as Bible instructs. Could we be witnessing beginnings of New Age warfare here? Will there be any gratitude among 8,000 who were and are ready to die for their beliefs? Will they be satisfied with destruction of their next primary target? Or will they continue until America is one of least powerful nations in world? Would that be a bad thing? Could it be necessary to world peace? Fear or not, these are truly exciting times.

For more Ed thoughts go to Bedinghamstudio.com.

To respond, write to edhowes@hotmail.com.

Let's imagine that al Qaeda and Pakistan are friendly allies. As a reward for 9/11, Pakistan presents al Qaeda with three or four nuclear weapons on ballistic missiles, supplied by North Korea. Or imagine three or four portable nukes flown in with regular drug supply and turned over to American right wing extremists to place, under supervision. They are detonated by telephone when time is right, or ballistic missiles are loaded on some innocuous ship like an oil tanker, which cruises into striking distance and launches entire payload at one or two targets.

For love of symbolism al Qaeda has demonstrated, strike comes when U.S. invades Iraq, where much of our Homeland Security is at moment. Washington D.C. is vaporized. The administration, with some advance warning, retires to its survival bunkers. When dust clears, they are all that is left of national government and call troops home to enforce martial law demanded by people. We intensify our war on terror by arresting you and your neighbor for lack of cooperation with new rules. This is as hard for us to imagine as Waco, Ruby Ridge, Oklahoma City or 9/11. If we can imagine it, we can start making decisions now about how we will allow such an event to affect us. I was hoping to warn Congress but they are so swamped with protest communications, my message is unlikely to reach them. They could be sacrificed before they fully realize threat. I heard 9/11 was result of communication failure. All successful attacks will be for this same reason.

Treason is a Capital crime. Providing aid and comfort to enemy in time of war is definition of treason or high treason. So why is Capitol trusting their lives to friends of al Qaeda in White House? Is it possible not one of them knows what I have told you?

We are told that America does not distinguish between terrorists and those who support them. Assisting escape of 8,000 al Qaeda supports terrorism as surely as money or training, which Congress also provides through Pakistan and other friends of President. Should people distinguish between traitors and those who support them? Is entire military and Congress as guilty as President and Secretary? How about taxpayers who make it all possible? Who is not guilty and due no punishment? Maybe America is overdue for a good whipping. Who will prevent it?

On other hand, this is a new age. An age of brotherhood and science. I can see that aiding escape of al Qaeda is a Christian and loving thing to do, not unlike allowing Saddam to leave Iraq with whatever entourage he chooses, before he is hunted down and eliminated. Who knows how we are loving Iran and North Korea? Though we might not see love as a result of world's most powerful military's care and attention, who am I to question men leading us into WWIII, great love war?

For more Ed thoughts see Bedinghamstudio.Com.

Respond to Ed at Edhowes @ Hotmail.com