Take another example. World War I has variously been described as "the total war," "a turning point in history," "the day world went mad," "the end of world." Writer Ernest Hemingway called it "the most colossal, murderous, mismanaged butchery that has ever taken place on earth."

Yet, that did not prevent World War II and 55 million souls that went with it. Nor has it prevented more than 100 million lives that have died in over 150 wars since 1914. Nor did it prevent "madness" of Sarajevo in Bosnia, or "ethnic cleansing" in Burundi and Rwanda, or "new war" on terror. Nor has it prevented 12 wars that are going on around world this very day!

So bottomline is that hanging of Saddham or Osama will never stop terrorism, nor will it make world a safer place. Another Saddham, another Osama, will rise tomorrow. The quest for "uhuru" or "kwacha," dawn, would turn out a dream, unless we address imbalances that precipitate terrorism, now. Otherwise we would wake up tomorrow and see UN building on fire. Or behold world in total darkness. Or begin to drop dead because of a mysterious plague, or worse, a nuclear bomb. (No thanks to terrorists.)

"Where were you when world stopped turning?" is lyric of a song by a musician in remembrance of collapsed Twin Towers. Dancers took to dance floors, and song went to top music chart show. That was good.

But by time terrorists actually prepare for show - down, there will be no musicians and dancers to celebrate world’s end. That would really be time when world would stop turning!

ARTHUR ZULU is controversial author of CHASING SHADOWS! (A book that reveals terrorists' master plan to finally set world on fire!) For a copy of book and FREE excerpt, goto:

http://www.1stbooks.com/bookview/21013

For contacts, mailto: mostcontroversialwriter@yahoo.com

The press releases claimed leader of this so called terrorist group was one Hassan Mahsun an Uygur living in exile who, it was further claimed, had strong ties to Al Qaida and had masterminded, among other things, several bomb attacks within China. These claims had been refuted by Mahsun in several prior interviews.

These were events of December 15 2003.

On December 23 2003 it was reported by BBC that Mahsun was killed in October 2003 by Pakistani soldiers in a raid on a suspected Al Qaida hideout in South Waziristan, Pakistan. It was further reported that Chinese Government were involved in making positive identification of body through DNA testing.

On same day Chinese newspaper Xinhua ran a similar story. Later that day Xinhua edited out all links to story claiming it had been withdrawn because of it's "sensitive nature". (Yahoo News) How then does PRC release fairly significant press statements identifying virtual "Bin Laden" of Uygur terrorists groups when they supposedly actively participated in his bodies identification in October? Why was Xinhua article cut?

It would seem that these events give strong credence to arguments that PRC is waging a calculated and pre-meditated campaign against Uygur. At very least it raises some very serious questions.

How could this happen? Perhaps because press release was written well in advance and set for release at a particular opportune time?

Does cutting of Xinhua article prove that PRC recognises it's fairly significant mistake?

Does fact that this mistake was allowed to occur prove that case for existence of Uygur terrorism argued by PRC is not taken seriously enough, even by them, to point that death of China's "Bin Laden" is of so little consequence?

These questions raise very serious doubts about Chinese claims as to existence of Uygur terrorist groups and in doing so suggests that Chinese "War on Terorism" is in fact a war on Uygur and their human rights.

It also casts serious doubts on US's and other countries' foreign policy towards China ( and other countries for that matter) in respect of human rights violations in name of "War on Terrorism".

In pursuit of objectives embodied in "War on Terrorism" are we "throwing baby out with bath water"?