Continued from page 1
Discovering
answers to these questions puts you one step closer to ensuring that your tender response hits
buyer's hot buttons.
Sin no 2. Not addressing
"real", core needs
Quite often, what's written in tender documentation only tells half
story. Either that or, it might be a comprehensive document, but
core hot buttons are buried within pages and pages of material and they're often easy to miss.
Unfortunately, many tender submissions miss
point completely. They're completed in such a rush that they simply don't address
"obvious" criteria, let alone,
"read between
lines" stuff.
Having said this, Government tender documentation (especially) is so long that it is easy to forget an important element. The document will often include mandatory and desirable requirements, a Schedule of Particulars, Evaluation Criteria, Project Description, Government purchasing policy and regulations and a background and scope to
project.
Usually, each of these areas reveals some priceless piece of information that you can then use in your document. Instead, many potential suppliers just fill out
Schedule of Particulars and address
evaluation criteria, but not address any other points revealed in
background material.
The background material will address what
potential supplier has been doing in
past, what their corporate policies and commitments are, and perhaps what their culture is. By showing how your product/service addresses this information, you'll have far greater impact.
The moral of
story?
Read
document thoroughly and then read it again. When you're doing that, grab a highlighter and highlight any points that are important to address in your document. These points could appear anywhere within
document. Not just in
product or evaluation criteria areas.
Then, when you've done that ask yourself "why". Why is this important to them? Then once you've discovered
answer, ask "why" again, until you cover
real, core need.
