Continued from page 1
Economic Implications
The primary industries affected by increasing
driving age to 18 are
automotive manufacturers, auto insurance, gas and driving education companies. This basically covers
largest firms within
auto industry.
The automotive manufacturers would only see a delay in purchases by a factor of three years and only for
first three years that
driving age was raised to 18. Most 18 year olds would receive their driver’s licenses during
summer after graduating from high school.
The auto insurance companies would hopefully gain revenues by not having to pay out insurance claims due to car accidents created by
15 – 18 old teens. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration indicates approximately 300,000 motor vehicle crashes resulting in injuries for this age group per year, which is above
figures for
fatalities mentioned earlier in this article. Therefore, auto insurance industry would have a gain from raising
age limit and not having to pay out 900,000 claims from car accidents over a three year period from age 15 to 18.
Gasoline companies would see a reduction in their revenues with
reduction of gasoline usage. Whether 15 – 18 year old drivers generate a significant impact upon
revenues of gasoline companies is unsubstantiated as of this writing. However, it would be safe to surmise some level of reduction would be apparent. The reduction of emissions would indeed benefit our planet.
Driving schools would see
most significant impact. Short term they would lose business for
first 3 years. Those three years could be used, however, to help provide them support by both State and Federal governments. The amount of financial effort that has been put forth after 9/11 against terrorist continues to question if only a fraction could be used in this effort to help save our teenagers. During these three years, assisting them to prepare courses should be considered. Long term
driving schools would actually fair better as they would have more hours per student to charge.
Affects upon
Family
For parents with new teen drivers with permit licenses going through a state Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) program, there will be no affect in
initial implementation of changing
driving age to 18. Parents with teens that have their operators license and who have allowed their teens to drive on their own will most likely find themselves having to continue to “chauffeur” their 16 – 18 year old teens to their various activities. While precious time would be encumbered, you can get comfort from
fact that your teen is still alive, your car is not damaged from an auto accident and your insurance has not doubled because of a teen driver on
policy.
What if we do not change
driving age?
I have a philosophy that
difference between utopia and reality is a choice. A choice by an individual or a group to make a change or move in a different direction. The statistics about teen driving require a change. If changing
driving age to 18 is too big of a leap today, then we can take smaller steps to help teens have better education and understand how to drive a car instead of blindly using a deadly weapon.
We need to review what
driving schools are asked to teach
students. The requirements need to include not only traffic safety, but car driving training under differing conditions. The number of hours required behind
wheel should equal
number of hours required for
course, which is currently around 30 hours. Parents would spend more money to achieve this, but
additional cost is insignificant compared to
lives of their loved ones.
Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) should be a requirement nationwide and include a probationary period for all new drivers to last through age 18. Traffic violations during
probationary period should require re-taking
driver education course -not with adults that are in a defensive driving course, but with other teens. Asking
teen to re-take driver education through
same school they received their initial education would be a consideration. Tracking
teens that re-take driver education and
driving schools they attend would also help understand if there is a driving school that may not be properly educating
teens.
Driving school vehicles are always well marked while students are driving on
main roads. Unfortunately, that requirement does not extend to
family vehicle for new drivers in a GDL program. All family vehicles with a new teen driver should be required to have at least one label on
back of
car while
teen is driving and through age 18.
Bumper stickers are not always practical when a teen is occasionally driving
car and stick-on vinyl to
window does not address night-time driving issues. The technology exists today to use car magnets that are thick, reflective for
night and are durable. These types of car magnets can be found at Auto Safety Magnets. http://www.autosafetymagnets.com Identifying these almost 2 million vehicles on
road should be a requirement on a national level.
In Conclusion
We hope
above information was helpful to address
problems,
need, and identify options if
driving age remained status quo or if it were raised. We hope
information was comprehensive to show
economic implications and
hindrances to raising
driving age. With these alarming statistics why have state and federal governments, as well as,
automotive industry jumped to
rescue? Have financial issues during hard economic times been put ahead of our youth? We have to "cowboy-up" to a resolution about this national problem.

Melih (may-lee) Oztalay, CEO Auto Safety Magnets Direct: (248) 568-2241 Web: http://www.autosafetymagnets.com Newsletter: http://www.autosafetymagnets.com/newsletter.php Blog: http://autosafetymagnets.blogspot.com