Public Schools Can Cripple Your Children's Ability To Read

Written by Joel Turtel


Continued from page 1

Author and education researcher Charles J. Sykes describes whole-language reading instruction in one first-grade classroom in his book "Dumbing Down Our Kids":

“Reading instruction begins with “pre-reading strategies” in which “children predict whatrepparttar story is about by looking atrepparttar 144104 title andrepparttar 144105 pictures. Background knowledge is activated to getrepparttar 144106 children thinking aboutrepparttar 144107 reading topic.” Then they readrepparttar 144108 story. If a child does not recognize a word, they are told to “look for clues.”

“The whole-language curriculum gave specific suggestions that children: “Look atrepparttar 144109 pictures,” ask “What would make sense?” “Look for patterns,” “Look for clues,” and “Skiprepparttar 144110 word and read ahead and then go back torepparttar 144111 word.” Finally, if all this fails, parents/teachers are told, “Tellrepparttar 144112 childrepparttar 144113 word. . . .”

“When kids couldn’t figure out a word, educationists gave these further ions: “Ask a friend, skiprepparttar 144114 word, substitute another meaningful word.” Sykes then asks, "Look atrepparttar 144115 pictures. Skiprepparttar 144116 word. Ask a friend. Is this reading?"

Duringrepparttar 144117 1990s, when whole-language instruction was in full force, outraged parents bitterly complained about their children's deteriorating ability to read. In response, public schools acrossrepparttar 144118 country then reverted to their usual tactics --- they keptrepparttar 144119 failed policy but changed its name to fool parents.

Many public schools today say they now teach kids to read with "balanced reading instruction." What this means is they combine whole-language instruction with a smattering of phonics. "See," they can say to parents, "we are now teaching your kids phonics." The only problem is that too oftenrepparttar 144120 "balance" is still about 80 percent whole-language, and 20 percent phonics, if and whenrepparttar 144121 teacher thinks phonics is "needed" in "special cases."

If you were a doctor and were treating a patient for a serious infection, would you giverepparttar 144122 patient a "balanced" cure of arsenic and antibiotics? That isrepparttar 144123 moral and practical status of "balanced" reading instruction where whole-language instruction still predominates, because whole-language isrepparttar 144124 arsenic of reading-instruction methods.

Parents, don't let public-school officials fool you with their glib talk of "balanced reading instruction." You need to personally investigate how your local school teaches your kids to read. The best thing to do is to test your children's true reading abilities with an outside, independent testing company. You may be shocked byrepparttar 144125 outcome ofrepparttar 144126 test. The Resources section of "Public Schools, Public Menace," lists many such independent reading-testing companies.



Joel Turtel is an education policy analyst. He is also the author of "The Welfare State: No Mercy For The Middle Class." Contact Information: Website: http://www.mykidsdeservebetter.com, Email: lbooksusa@aol.com, Phone: 718-447-7348, Article Copyrighted © 2005 by Joel Turtel, Article can be reprinted on ezines or newsletters only if Contact information to Joel Turtel and his website is included.




Parents' Complaints --- Arrogant Public Schools Turn a Deaf Ear

Written by Joel Turtel


Continued from page 1

Many school officials believe parents should not have any real input in their children’s education. That is one reason why school authorities hold their committee meetings in secret.

Another reason is that school authorities fear that parents will complain about certain classes and curriculum subjects. For instance, many public schools have introduced classes and books about homosexuality into elementary and high-school sex-education classes. When parents find out about these classes, they frequently complain torepparttar school principal and local politicians. To avoid these complaints, public schools often try to keep secret from parents what they teach in these sex-ed classes.

Moreover, teachers, principals, and school authorities don't have to listen to those amateur, irritating parents who complain that their kids can't read. Public-school employees get tenure after a few years. That means, in effect, that it's almost impossible to fire them, no matter how bad or even mediocre they are. If you couldn't be fired, would you care about parent's complaints? That's why they don't, and that's why public-school teachers or principals can be arrogant or indifferent to parent's legitimate complaints.

Parents,repparttar 144103 solution is to stop hitting your head againstrepparttar 144104 brick wall of arrogant public-school employees. Just walk aroundrepparttar 144105 wall and don't look back. That is, consider taking your children out of public school and find real education choice and control inrepparttar 144106 education free-market. Consider homeschooling or some ofrepparttar 144107 many quality, low-cost, K-12 Internet private schools listed inrepparttar 144108 Resource section of "Public Schools, Public Menace."



Joel Turtel is an education policy analyst. He is also the author of "The Welfare State: No Mercy For The Middle Class." Contact Information: Website: http://www.mykidsdeservebetter.com, Email: lbooksusa@aol.com, Phone: 718-447-7348. Article Copyrighted © 2005 by Joel Turtel. Article can be reprinted on ezines or newsletters only if Contact information to Joel Turtel and his website is included.




    <Back to Page 1
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use