Continued from page 1
The link between product and consumer needs involves
connection between features (what
product does) and outcomes for users. In
case of
shampoo example, let's say
product's features include a new moisturizer that makes our hair more attractive. In turn, more attractive hair means we're more likely to enjoy a busier social life. So,
marketer who emphasizes
outcome or benefit (a more active social life) will sell more shampoo than a marketer who focuses on
product or its features (new moisturizer).
In non-sales fields that idea of addressing
needs of readers and listeners isn't nearly as well appreciated. Consider internal memos, composed and circulated by millions of well-meaning managers and supervisors. Many of them focus on
needs of
manager or
organization, and not on
reader,
person who needs to be persuaded by
writer of
memo.
Would internal memos work more effectively if their writers focused on
reader instead of themselves? Would people making in-house presentations get better responses by building their pitches on
needs or aspirations of
audience? I think so. The experience in sales has shown, overwhelmingly, that benefits outsell features (features being
characteristics of
product or service being sold).
When you next set out to send an important message, pause long enough to ask yourself whether persuasion is your goal -- either directly or indirectly. If you do want to persuade, then ask yourself if you've focused sufficiently on
recipients. That's
starting point for persuasive communication.

Robert F. Abbott writes and publishes Abbott's Communication Letter. Each week subscribers receive, at no charge, a new communication tip that helps them lead or manage more effectively. Click here for more information: http://www.CommunicationNewsletter.com