As you can see, three leaders have: (Google) 45.85%, (Yahoo) 15.35%, and (MSN) 10.86%. While four losers, AOL, Dogpile, Ask Jeeves, Alta Vista, have a combination of only 6%. Did you notice gap Google gave Yahoo and MSN? Then did you notice gap Google gave combine group of losers? No wonder Google’s stock rose considerably from $190 in February to $220 on May 1 2005. With Google stock now trading above $290, analyst vow that it’s heading for $350 or more—its market value is now about $80 billion. But why is Google leading and some losing? Google is leading simply because it wants to.

In business, as in every thing in life, winners will always find a way to win and losers will always find a way to lose. Whatever business you are or intend to go into, you must have a backup plan for market control least you remain a loser.

Most people start a business but fail to advance. They are technicians, artists, marketers, not entrepreneurs. You need help—a holistic plan. Visit http://superriches.com/linkdw.htm and download Secrets of billionaires—how to be super rich free and learn how to prosper a business.

Mind you, a market leader need not control world market. Your market could be your street, your community, state, country, continent, or if you like whole world. You just need to have a measure of control. Microsoft knows value of control, Dell does, Walt Mart does, and all billionaires and super rich know damn well that market leaders make money.

- Appoint a scribe to document meeting results

- Have a "parking lot" for topics not on agenda - at end of meeting - Review parking lot, decide resolution, assign follow-up, if appropriate

- Anyone who feels process is not supporting objectives of meeting should speak up and share this observation

- Decide date and time for next meeting, if needed

- Debrief meeting (should take less than 5 minutes). Ask questions like Was meeting necessary? Did meeting begin and end on time? Was agenda adhered to? Were participants objective, and all viewpoints heard? Were outside interruptions avoided? Did all participants have an opportunity to contribute? Were digressions and repetitions avoided? Were win/win solutions achieved? Was feedback offered and accepted?

- End on time