This means that they not only knew and worked with these metals, but that they understood science of atoms and nuclei - for 'highward' state of white powder is only achieved through knowledge of high-spin metallurgical experience. Only by understanding this part-physical and part-metaphysical science can one take a physical something and turn it into nothing by applying principle of 0=(+1) + (-1). {The IO Torus, Logos and Harmonics are all associated}Interestingly, high-spin powder of gold has a distinct effect upon pineal gland {See entry on Thalami} and its increased melatonin production, while equivalent powder of iridium has its similar effect on serotonin production of pituitary gland.

Although current names of platinum-group metals are relatively new to us, metals themselves are far from new. Recent tests have shown that, by dry-matter weight, over 5 per cent of our brain tissue is composed of iridium and rhodium in high-spin state. (28)

So, what precisely is highward or high-spin state which converts these noble metals into an impalpable white powder? A normal atom has around it a screening potential - a positive screening produced by nucleus. The majority of electrons going round nucleus are within this screening potential, except for very outer electrons. The nucleus goes to highward or high-spin state when positive screening potential expands to bring all of electrons under control of nucleus. {Refer to Solid State chemistry and work of Don Robins as it relates to 'scavengers', microphages in genetic structure also have an effect that may be similar. Can meta-mind attune these electrons and bring their forward and reverse spins into conjunction?}

These electrons normally travel around nucleus in pairs - a spin-forward electron and a spin-reverse electron. But when these come under influence of a high-spin nucleus {Is this a conscious act?}, all spin-forward electrons become correlated with spin-reverse electrons. When perfectly correlated, electrons turn to pure 'white light' and it is impossible for individual atoms in high-spin substance to link together.” (29)

Whether or not they can do these things today: they (Alchemists or Rosicrucians of Great White Brotherhood of Master Craftsmen) certainly have done such things in past. Did they learn process from remnants of a previous 'modern' human? That seems more likely to us than alien explanation they want us to accept. Was there a program to keep these things super secret? There certainly should have been. In Morning of Magicians Pauwels and Bergier tell about a meeting they had with Fulcanelli as well as a presentation he made to Paris Academy of Sciences. One of these authors was a member of Heisenberg's team of scientists working on splitting atom and other was editor of 'Earth' magazine. Fulcanelli warned about dangers of atomic forces that science was about to unleash and he explained how Cathedrals were constructed to include knowledge they were seeking. I've read his book which purports to include keys to this knowledge. It is extremely cryptic in nature but I think if one was to be able to create green vitreole of stained glass windows (no easy art, but available in other places) then it might be true.

If these things are explanation for Sodom and Gomorrah, or vitrified rocks then we have some real concerns to address about our leaders and their willingness to do one thing and say another. It is very unlikely that this knowledge has not been object of secret agents and desire of monarchs and others' concerns for many millennia. We know Crowley, Hitler, and guys like Barrett ('Secret Societies') join likes of Bacon and Dee in these quests. Truly power does corrupt and we know that when a few people have power to do these kinds of things, it will eventually become a factor. The present situation seems to indicate that many people will have access to terrific uses of technology and we must not be as naïve as audience of Britannica was at start of 20th century when they wrote that torture was a thing of past, as far as 'civilized' Europe was concerned.

The real problem when checking a diode using diode test function of a digital meter is that an open or leaky diode, meter sometimes reads ok(0.6). This is due to digital meter diode test output voltage (which you can measure output test probe using another meter) is around 500mv to 2v. An analog meter set to x1 ohms have output about 3V(remember two 1.5V battery you installed in meter!). The 3V voltage is enough to show you accurate reading of a diode when under test.

Even if you have a good reading at x1 ohms doesn't mean that diode is good . You now have to set your meter to x10K to test diode again. The output voltage of x10k ohms is about 12V(remember 9v battery in your meter-1.5v+1.5v+9v=12v). Again diode under test should show only one reading. This is exception to Schottky diode where it have two readings but not shorted reading. If meter showed one reading then diode under test is good. If it has two readings then most probably diode is either shorted or leaky. The digital meter can't test it because output from meter is only 500mv to 2V.

If a diode breakdown when under full operating voltage, there is no way to testing diode (unless you have a very expensive diode checker which specially designed to locate this type of problem).Substituting with a known good diode is often only way to prove that an intermittent diode is causing a particular problem. Sometimes an intermittent diode could be locate using a coolant spray.

Caution: Be certain that power is removed from any circuit before performing any of following diode checks, otherwise meter or circuit damage could result.

Conclusion-In order to correctly test diode function you need to set analog meter to x1 ohms and x10K ohms range.