‘[T]heir criteria for selection will be profoundly marked by Anglo-Saxon outlook.’”

Thomas Carlyle understood need for a paternalistic benefactor or hero and he also knew there were few ethical people who rose to such heights. His protégé John Ruskin has influenced world in many ways I think Carlyle and his Hibernian influenced Illuminati (study Goethe and William of Hesse please) might not have agreed with. However, I am more than a little aware of Hegelian Dialectic or ‘play both ends against middle’ program. You might wonder if this all makes any sense at all. It really does not. You might think I am one who makes no sense. I assure you I know what I am talking about but it cannot be conveyed in one book or even two. Here is some more to chew on. It includes Rothschild backed Cecil Rhodes and leads to many modern Rhodes or Bilderberg ‘front’ men like Bill Clinton and his CIA Director Woolsey who properly says War on Terror is WWIV. All these wars were planned by likes of Rothschild and Albert Pike as 19th Century came to a close. “That "simple desire" had been firmly implanted in Rhodes' bosom at Oxford by John Ruskin. Ensconced as first Slade Professor of Fine Arts at Oxford in 1870, Ruskin's influence reached to all corners of earth and is still widely felt, though seldom recognized, today. ‘He hit Oxford like an earthquake,’ wrote historian Carroll Quigley, ‘not so much because he talked about fine arts, but because he talked also about empire and England's downtrodden masses, and above all because he talked about all three of these things as moral issues.’ Tolstoy regarded him as one of greatest minds of any time or nation. Gandhi carried his message to India. G.B. Shaw and his Fabian Socialist confreres popularized Ruskin's thought worldwide.” (2)

I greatly admire Annie Besant too. She started India as much as Gandhi did. She was one of very few women to be a Mason and her Fabian influences are many.