When Chief Justice Moore's opinion describes lives of gay and lesbian people as "abhorrent," "immoral," "detestable," an "inherent evil," and "an intolerable evil." He condemns homosexuality as "so heinous that it defies one's ability to describe it." Relying on ancient sources of criminal law, rather than current knowledge about lesbian and gay parents and their children, he emphasizes that, in his mind, any person in a lesbian or gay relationship is unfit to have custody. That unyielding position is contrary to Canons of law and shows Chief Justice Moore's disregard for requirements of his judicial office. Have liberals demanded he step down?

We have reached precipuce in matter of separation of church and state. The enemy is gearing up for largest assault against rights of our countrymen. We must take action immediately. Only by building political power of liberal Democrats will we be able to stop conservatives from achieving their dangerous vision for country and world! We must also embolden liberal Democrats to fight against conservative tide in Washington, DC and state legislatures throughout country. Don't get mistaken idea that opposition is decent, honest and conservative, that simply isn't case. Like a faith in rationality, they move forward in blind pursuit of wealth and power.

Look it doesn’t matter what YOU think reality of personal characteristic qualities of Bush are. The reality for 61,000,000 people is that they PERCEIVE it to be reality. The real story of this election, that has yet to be told, is that it was decided SOLELY based upon perceived qualities of leadership. Plain and simply, majority judged Bush as being a more capable leader. That doesn’t mean he is a capable leader, strong, decisive or moral. It just means that people perceive him that way.

Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Hussein, Qaddafi, Khan, Il, and Mao Zedong are all extremists that had backing of people. They were not moral people. They gained their power to rule from consent of those that they were ruling. Any of these people could have been stopped at any stage on their rise to power by opposition of people. People followed them because they lead. You cannot run an opposition party and expect it to be successful by just opposing, line by line or issue for issue, what other party’s guy is pushing. You need to give people something to believe in. They don’t have to agree with everything your saying and in case of those above, message doesn’t even have to be one of sanity, but people need to believe that you have some kind of grand vision or direction.

The Democratic Party lost not because it went too far left but because it failed to go far enough. There is no certainty in middle. Leaders aren’t borne of compromise. George W. Bush doesn’t try to hide fact that he is a conservative Republican. Kerry tried to run from label of “liberal”. Bush wasn’t elected because he has compromised or moved to middle. In fact people voted for him because he wouldn’t compromise.

People that voted for Bush believed he has vision. 61,000,000 people didn’t vote for John Kerry because they perceived, accurately or not, that he had no direction. It wasn’t November 2nd when John Kerry lost election. It was when Kerry allowed commercials to paint him as a flip-flopper that fight was lost. The made up lies of Swift Boat Veterans had nothing to do with it. A well-run campaign headed by a resolute leader would have looked at that incident as an opportunity to show ferocity and strength of a decorated combat veteran. The Kerry campaign hoped it would just go away. Leaders stand up for what they believe in, for what is right, and they are willing to indefinitely fight for what moves them. This is how you get people to walk along side you. Kerry didn’t embody characteristics of a leader and only reason why he came as close as he did to Presidency was because he was opposing worst President in history of United States. But then again, that’s just my perception.