A link from content block could be considered as more likely to be a true recommendation than a link from a text link advertisement block. Search engines may therefore give extra weight to in-content links while devaluing links that appear to be advertisements. Sites that rent links through link networks usually do place them in a block above, below or to side of content block. When VIPS is implemented, there is a risk that many rented advertisement links could be devalued.

Improved Contextual Analysis

The theme in which your link is placed also will be more important than ever before. Many search engine optimizers have voiced their opinion that �anchor text is everything�; that is, theme of a page linking to a Web site does not parse link relevance, but only anchor text of link does.

With block-level analysis, search engines will be able to recognize theme of any given block more easily. This should have effect of boosting link relevance for links from tightly-themed content blocks, while devaluing links that are in a block with no apparent theme.

Links That Will Always Soar

A search engine optimizer need not fear effects of VIsion-based Page Segmentation. Although VIPS will probably devalue certain types of links that are favored by many SEOs, it will concurrently increase value of themed, in-context links.

I have always stressed value of legitimate links from directories, articles and press releases. These types of links are placed in a content block and are also tightly themed (that is, your target keywords will be near your link).Webmasters who actively build these types of links will benefit from long term rankings even when new twists such as VIPS are added into algorithmic mix. In fact, these algorithmic improvements should improve search relevance and neutralize some of spammier link building methods. And that�s something we should all be happy about.

The events of history can be searched more specifically, where that is desire of user.

An issue for some people is to be indexed in first place.

You can join queue and wait, or get indexed through a spidered link on a site that is regularly indexed. One purpose of a spider/robot is to follow links, and this also ties in with suggestions that javascripted links may obstruct/slow down spidering process.

A simple way to get such a link is to contribute something/anything to article directories. In return for your "textual" input, a link via your resource box can point to your domain.

It is generally agreed that spiders like text, or more importantly, new text.

A sensible defence of such a claim is that we don't especially want MATCHES for banners, images or anything uninformative. Such images, like annals of history, can be searched specifically.

Another logical defence of such a claim is that we really are living in INFORMATION AGE, and mediums to relay information are still predominately verbal and textual, however delivered.

While it may be an overstatement to say that Search Engine Optimisation is to webpages, as Neural Linguistic Programming is to humans, it may not be too ridiculous.

Remember

1.You are dealing with software that is attempting to analyse like a human. It cannot do this as readily as organic intelligence.

2.You are dealing with software, familiar with abusive human strategies of deception, and has in-built counter measures. There are humans behind software, wise to will of cheats.

3.You must help it with your selected keywords/search phrases, which you deem to relevant. Their densities will determine relevance from a textual degree, whatever about a “site-relevance” degree. Too often is word spamming, and not enough is irrelevant. Anywhere between two and five wouldn’t be too bad, and depends on who you talk to, or indeed, listen to. Make more pages instead of trying to fit every conceivable keyword into one page. A lot of people do this at beginning, which is understandable as well, but body text just won’t make any sense and any visitor will get a headache as surely as you will. Spare both parties.

4. Some engines insist on robot text, and should probably be facilitated, even though some have a commercial interest in their insistence. Robot text is not difficult to learn or implement and name of it, should not be a deterrent.

5. Metatags are designed to assist as well and are nothing to be feared, but favoured, should you decide to use them.

6.You must get indexed, to bear any optimised fruit. This should no longer be difficult either.