Continued from page 1
For many people,
constructive value of open electronic communication is in networking; for them, anonymity is not useless but counter-productive. Indeed, even on a service that allows users to remain anonymous, many people make a point of establishing their serious intentions by identifying themselves at
outset. But, for
social adventures of
virtual, anonymity is
magical cloak of invisibility that makes anything possible. It's their ticket to live not just one life, but a hundred.
A huge amount of online traffic consists of anonymous, idle socializing - much of it in little more than monosyllabic grunts - and cruising in search of dates. In their primordial social ooze a woman might wish to travel as a man in order to avoid constantly being hit by
75 percent or so online users who are male. On
other hand a lady whom I met online blazely remarks, "Here, no one can drag you into a dark alley". Consequently, woman can move around confidently online than they can in real life.
The same lady whom I met online got injured years ago and uses clutches to get around. She met her friend online. Disabled people - and to lesser degree
elderly, who are less likely to be computer-literate and have access to computers - from vigorous online communities use them for companionship and for gathering information that their impaired mobility might put out of reach. They find online conversation is possible with people who are uncomfortable with disabilities or who assume that an old person would have nothing relevant to say. Neither age nor physical impairment is detectable on
Internet.
I wonder how long these kindly impulses -
outburst of filial communicativeness,
dissemination of information to strangers,
warm welcomes and
help and comfort freely given will survive. Are they only passing effects of infatuations with a new toy? Or do they represent
manifestation in huge populations of human impulses hitherto confined to small groups?
And what should we expect
explosion of electronic communication to bring in coming years? Fecundation, a new renaissance,
exponential growth of understanding, invention and knowledge? Or a spreading morass of mediocrity, acres of idle chatter, oceans of intellectual corn flakes? Should we look forward to
extinction of boredom or
exhaustion of curiosity?
Take your pick. Electronic communication is
latest human invention to have
potential of completely remaking our world. But
essence of making
most of this wonderful opportunity will be to avoid tampering with it. We must accept it as it comes, because it is mirror, and its blemishes are our own. Well-meaning efforts to censor language or control content can act as disastrous to what may be
last place where genuine liberty thrives.

Dr. Adnan Ahmed Qureshi holds a Ph.D. in IT with specialization in the induction of information technology in developing countries. He is the former Editor of Datalog, Computech, ISAsia and columnist for The News International. At present he is working as Senior Industry Analyst and IT Consultant.