Lawsuit Loans. No Risk Funding

Written by Fred Coutts

Continued from page 1

There are a handful of companies that provide lawsuit funding. For more information on these lawsuit loan companies please visit Each company provides funding that is specific to their criteria. All lawsuit funding companies will provide funding for personal injury lawsuits. But there are only a couple that will fund commercial and other non- personal injury lawsuit cases.

Rates will vary depending uponrepparttar risk. Lawsuit funding companies will generally finance up to 10-15% ofrepparttar 142740 potential settlement value. For example, ifrepparttar 142741 case has a potential value of $100,000, you can expect a funding offer of $10,000 to $15,000. Lawsuit funding companies carefully analyzerepparttar 142742 cases they choose to fund. They must likerepparttar 142743 lawyer as well asrepparttar 142744 potential settlement value.

Lawsuit funding is available in most states and can be a very beneficial source of funds. For more information please contactrepparttar 142745 author Fred Coutts at or phone at 888-942-6639.


Title 18 U.S.C. §2257

Written by Don_One

Continued from page 1

And to tell yourepparttar truth, I think I might be getting off easy (no pun intended, I assure you). I do not host web cams at my site. The reason I mention that is, get this: owner-operators of web cam sites are now required to record and retain, as a file, all live sessions inrepparttar 142680 spirit of keeping withrepparttar 142681 law. We’re talking terabytes (and no, that’s notrepparttar 142682 name of a new porn star) of information storage withinrepparttar 142683 scope of one or two months forrepparttar 142684 proto-typical site. That web cam site is going to cost a small fortune in extra hosting quotas.

Now a lot of rational-minded legal folk think that there’s no way that this new interpretation ofrepparttar 142685 law will weather judiciary appeal.

That being said, my gripe withrepparttar 142686 law, is notrepparttar 142687 source of my uneasiness. The “bad feeling” stems fromrepparttar 142688 fact that I don’t expect this statute, as it pertains torepparttar 142689 average webmaster, to be thrown out or even reasonably modified. Lately, there just seems to be a rash of adult-unfriendly (and Free Speech-assaulting, mind you) bills and decisions that have passed in state and local legislatures all aroundrepparttar 142690 country; decisions you wouldn’t have expected to have gonerepparttar 142691 way that they eventually did:

1. The decision to upholdrepparttar 142692 ban onrepparttar 142693 sale of sextoys inrepparttar 142694 states of Alabama, Texas, and Georgia. 2. The passing ofrepparttar 142695 watered-down-yet-still-onerous version ofrepparttar 142696 original Missouri bill SB 32. 3. The sudden closing of a legal loophole by a New York Appellate Division court; an act that will imminently and without warning shut down a ton of Big Apple adult businesses unless it is repealed.

It seemsrepparttar 142697 Bush administration, with U.S. Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales prominently inrepparttar 142698 foreground, is truly waging a war on pornography. Let’s hope that this war comes to a better resolution thanrepparttar 142699 one in Iraq, so far…(I’m sorry, I couldn’t resist. :-))

The author is affiliated with, and writes regular porn and sex toy articles for his blog page.

    <Back to Page 1 © 2005
Terms of Use