Continued from page 1
The solution to this dynamic URL problem has been discussed widely in search engine forums and solutions have been bandied about including software provided by SEO's, URL re-write techniques for dynamic pages on APACHE servers http://www.alistapart.com/articles/urls/ and PHP pages http://www.stargeek.com/php-seo.php to generate search engine friendly URL's. Others recommend simply adding static HTML sitemap pages as alternatives for
search engine spiders.
In this instance
client's developer simply said "I can't do that (PHP solution) on this server". So we resorted to putting up
static HTML sitemap pages with hard-coded URLS to
main 54 pages of
site at http://lawfirm411.com/Law-Firm-411-sitemap.html This should get at least those fifty pages crawled by Googlebot, but Googles' spider appears not to be crawling this site at all.
How do we know this? See for yourself by using
following query in
search box at Google: allinurl:www.lawfirm411.com where
result page shows ONE page in
results. If you try that query on your own site (replace your own domain name for lawfirm411.com), you'll see
results lists ALL your pages.
The site home page was crawled by Google four months ago, when they took their "Cached Snapshot" of
page. You can see this by visiting
Google cached page here: http://66.102.7.104/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=U TF-8&q=cache:www.lawfirm411.com where
date of this snapshot is "Apr 20, 2004 07:42:19 GMT" and they haven't been back since. The page in that snapshot has none of
newly added links, an outdated title tag, and old content.
This problem is not unique to this site. One client we worked with two years ago had a dynamically generated, framed site! Those two site structures have always given search engines trouble. Their site was not crawled at all and only
front page showed up. Our solution was to create a second domain (owned by
client), which had static HTML pages that precisely mirrored
content of
client's framed, dynamically generated site. Guess what happened after Googlebot crawled
static site? Google indexed
framed site in full and then banned
static site from
index!
Not an approach we advocate, but
one that worked for this client.
We're still searching for ways to get Googlebot back to LawFirm411.com before creating that new static site, but decided to share this odd experience with
SEO community before going to any extremes. Google provides over 70% of most search engine referred traffic to ALL of our clients and we realized we can't site idly by and see a major client languish because Googlebot didn't like what it found at
client site on
first visit four months ago.
This issue dogs newer sites in other places as well. The Open Directory Project has also become notoriously slow in adding new sites to
directory and in this case, has not picked up this site even after 6 regular monthly submissions. The web playing field may have begun tilting toward older, established sites and away from new ones.

------------------------------------------------------------ Mike Banks Valentine is the SEO for http://www.lawfirm411.com Contact him at http://www.seoptimism.com/SEO_Contact.htm Improve Your Small Business Online at our Ecommerce Tutorial http://website101.com/Free-Tutorials/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------