Fluoride is, Hexafluorosilicic acid, a toxic industrial waste by-product, derived from Super-Phosphate, a fertiliser and Aluminium manufacturing. It is a fact that Sodium silicofluoride (Fluoride) has never been registered anywhere in world as "safe" for human beings. It has been accepted scientifically and by some health and medical authorities that "Fluoridated drinking water, must not be used in preparation of "Baby formula nutrition" because of dangerously high potential, of children receiving a poisonous overdose.

International scientific studies have shown that there is very little difference, if any, between incidence of decayed, missing or filled teeth in children, or adults living in Fluoridated, or non-Fluoridated areas.

Medical professionals and scientists are warning that water fluoridation has dangerous long term health consequences, yet we are still allowing authorities to force it upon our children. Perhaps you should check out our Web Sites listed below, you will certainly learn a few things that will improve your health.

Need Content? You may use this article at your Web Site or Newsletter, The only requirement is inclusion of following sentence, "Article by Alfred Jones of http://www.sugarsr4u.com and http://www.rusweetenuf.com Learn about Glyconutrients, The Essential Sugars for Life".

Thirdly, 100% of hair loss sufferers are candidates for FUE. In past, hair restoration was not as widely available to every hair loss sufferer as it is today. There were various criteria that each candidate had to meet to be eligible for a hair transplant. Such criteria included patient’s age, color and texture of hair, skin complexion, amount of donor hair available, and future hair loss projections. However, because methods involved with follicular unit extraction are so advanced, such criteria are not much of a concern. For example, amount of donor hair on head is not an issue when determining candidacy because procedure allows for extraction of hair from other parts of body.

Fourthly, incidence of complication during FUE procedure is lower than with other transplantation methods. In a study, published by Dr. Masumi Inaba, of over 150 patients treated with FUE, researchers found that patients suffered only from mild discomfort from sitting still for several hours at a time. Furthermore, only four out of 150 patients experienced donor area shock, while two more patients experienced a more limited variety of patchy circular alopecia (hair loss). Nevertheless, all patients made full recoveries within five weeks.

Lastly, FUE patients recover without visible scars in donor or recipient area. Unlike previous methods, like strip incision, where an unattractive linear scar was exposed in donor area, FUE does not leave ugly, unbearable scars on head. Instead, tiny slits that are cut in recipient area are conveniently hidden by new hair. The final result of FUE in all patients is that of a seamless, natural, healthy-looking head of hair.

For all those who are suffering from hair loss and are searching for best method of restoring their youth, follicular unit extraction should be considered. It is a hair restoration method that discards use of painful linear donor incision and regards 100% of hair loss patients as proper candidates for procedure. It is widely predicted that within coming years, follicular unit extraction will make further advancements and become method of choice for every hair restoration surgeon and patient.