Continued from page 1
* Identify a list of minimum acceptable answers. (For example, acceptable answers to
previous question might be "I would schedule a meeting with both reviewers and try to reach a consensus" or "I would work to gain a better understanding of both comments and identify a solution that would work for all parties.")
* Ask a negative question so you can see how
person handles stress and conflict (for example, "tell me about a situation where you failed" or "tell me about a time when you disagreed with your boss").
* At
most, you should talk only 25-30% of
time. By mostly listening and observing, you will gain maximum information about each candidate.
* Leave time for
candidate to ask questions. You will see whether
person is prepared and/or took time to research your company. A candidate who does not ask questions probably did not prepare adequately for
interview.
* Observe each candidate. Ask yourself whether each has a business-like presentation and whether they look
part of
job. I also like to see how well they can articulate their role on a given project. It is a bad sign when candidates seem unfamiliar with their own work.
As important as
tangible requirements are for
job, so are
intangible ones. Look for a firm handshake, direct eye contact, professional bearing, and appropriate clothing. Understanding how to ask questions is very important and there are numerous references on
subject. Years ago, I was asked during an interview whether I planned to have more children. Of course,
question was an illegal one, but a surprising number of people still manage to ask similar questions. Being prepared and informed is
best way to avoid these pitfalls. USING MULTIPLE INTERVIEWERS
Having more than one person interview a candidate increases your perspective. What you may see and what someone else may see can be quite different. When you are trying to choose between two very good candidates, a second or third opinion will make
decision more clear. You might consider having any of
following participate:
* Technical personnel (perhaps an engineer or programmer who may act as a subject matter expert)
* Other department staff (co-workers can provide excellent feedback as to whether they will feel comfortable with
candidate)
* Personnel staff
Although you may be
person with
ultimate hiring authority, you will find it very useful to be able to talk each candidate over with other people. You may find that they like a candidate you did not or vice-versa. In general, consensus hiring will produce better results than a unilateral hiring decision, so take their feedback seriously. One manager I interviewed for this article uses a weighted system when considering a candidate: 30% skills, 30% personality, and 40% business-like presentation. In my own experience,
latter two are
greatest predictors of a candidate's success. When candidates don't work out,
reason tends to involve how they handle conflict or how well they communicate. You will, of course, need to develop your own system. CONSIDERING TESTING
Although I have not yet used a test for candidates, I have certainly taken them as part of a job application and I am considering using them in
future. You cannot be sure
candidate shows you work they have actually done, but you will be able to see their work if you give them a test. Many companies develop their own tests. You may consider anything from a personality profile to a writing and/or editing test. IN CONCLUSION
There is no boilerplate method or template that you can apply directly to your department, group, or company. However, you can use this process as a model to develop your own own process, guidelines, and interview questions. What you look for and what someone else looks for in a candidate are likely to be quite different. But by developing a process, defining
position, and nailing down your questions well in advance before interviewing candidates, you vastly increase
likelihood of a successful hiring decision.

Need a technical writer? With a database of over 15,000 tech writers nationwide, we're positive we have the ideal technical writing services for you. http://www.writingassist.com