Personally I would give Constantine Peabody Award for Marketing as he (A Mithras worshipper who was made divine by his children at point of his death in pagan custom of Roman Empire-builders, who also had many of their relatives killed in horrific ways at that juncture.) co-opted teaching of Christ. It is my opinion that Christ was an alchemist as were his ancestors including Solomon, and Melchizedek. The intrigues are many to say least. Today most people still think there is truth in lie that alchemists were hermits seeking to make lead into gold and yet that was desire of entirely materialistic medieval kings and nobles. Alchemists like myself do have to live hermit existence if they (like me) are unwilling to sell out, but many of them are within bowels of hegemony. They encouraged many fakirs to lay claim to having ability to do things they could not do.

Aquinas and Frater Albertus (greatly admired by one of Illuminati founders - Goethe) said that their homonunclus was 'the talking-head of Jesus'. Now what might that really have been that they made? I suggest they were in process of making a Stone and had a way to foretell certain events that likes of Edward Kelley did. He too is said to have had a Stone and England's arguably greatest scholar (and spy) John Dee believed Kelley. But I think Aquinas and Magnus had same thing Kelley had - a scryring stone or skull. Such skulls as are found in Mexico have a many millennia artifactual relationship in ancestor-worship throughout ages and all cultures have had some kind of shamanistic people who attuned through them.

I know that this is not a full answer and there is no way I can give a real and full answer in a few pages. The lies of those hiding knowledge are equaled by lies of those seeking or fearing knowledge.

I propose now that magic is to religion as banditry is to politics. As banditry challenges ultimate legitimacy of political power, so magic challenges that of spiritual power. Magic and religion can be mutually distinguished, in ancient world or in modern one, by political and prescriptive definitions but not by substantive, descriptive, or neutral descriptions.” (3)

He could have added that illegitimate offspring who seek to return to state of power in their father or grandfather’s time as in case of Hitler often over-achieve. In Napoleon’s case he may have sought legendary Tuscan noble position of many centuries earlier. Some will even say I have a genetic pre-disposition to grandeur because I am a ‘bastard’ of THE Bruce. But I am a BRD of language of Birds and it seems to have helped me understand lesser codes of Green Languages.

“Divination is one of man's oldest spiritual technologies, its origins lost in shift from neolithic hunter-gatherers to settled agriculturalists. As shaman developed into priest, divination, along with all forms of spiritism, became codified into mythology. From a framework of mythic events and divination - literally readings of divine - came language, which evolved over time into written forms based on original symbolic elements. In turn, these symbolic elements became focus of divinatory practices of their own, creating sub-sets of meaning within common words and phrases. From this intentional ambiguity arose possibility of an initiate's language, a language of birds, or, as it was expressed by medieval initiates, Green Language.

Although we can point to Green Language {Of Hibernians including Swift, Carlyle, and many Great Scots.}in works as diverse as Midsummer Night's Dream and The Chymical Wedding of Christian Rosencruz, Nostradamus' quatrains, 18th century alchemical texts and surrealist manifestos, few authors have bothered to explain it. One who did was Fulcanelli, enigmatic 20th century alchemist and philosopher, in his masterpiece The Mystery of Cathedrals, published in Paris in 1926. Here we have an authentic, although mysterious, voice of authority; one that was both master of Green Language itself, and a master of subjects usually hidden within it.” (4)