3. The insiders can groom their public company as a takeover target for an industry giant. Our spinoff test insiders are creating a multi-dollar share price to allow them to fund their company. The equity cash infusion will be converted into cash-producing business income. The strong share price will be used to acquire cash-producing assets. In five to seven years, company should have a hundred million dollars in assets. An industry giant will buy public company based upon its share price. The insiders will retire multimillionaires.

The odds of arranging a merger are better than odds of creating an industry giant. It takes less than ten years to become perfect merger candidate. It usually takes over 20 years to become an industry giant. It makes sense to strive to be a merger candidate.

In ten years, a promoter can run about four "Pump & Dump" public companies. These promotions could earn promoter about a half-million dollars. The promoter could create one real company and groom it as a merger candidate. In ten years, promoter can walk away as a multimillionaire.

The most profitable strategy in going public is to build a company and seek a friendly merger. It's this group of merger oriented entrepreneurs that I want to help.

To contact author: Visit Beowulf Investments website: [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/] Or, visit Global Village Investment Club Website: [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/globalvillageinvestmentclubwelcome/]

It costs money to do a successful IPO. You'll find that those VC Financial Managers will divert your advertising budget into general advertising that acquaints potential stock buyers with your company. It doesn't bother VC that none of potential stock buyers are buyers of your product or service. The axiom is that when investors recognize name of your company, they'll buy your stock. It's VC's stock, not company's product or service that is being sold.

It costs money to do an IPO. That money comes from your company's cash flow. Until you receive proceeds from IPO, you won't have money to expand your business. If cash flow isn't adequate to pay IPO costs, expect VC to issue more stock and dilute your ownership further.

You can invest in a search to find a Venture Capitalist. I don't think your VC strategy is sound. You are betting against odds that you'll find a VC. If you find a VC, you'll lose control of your company. When your company goes public, you could find that your insider group owns less than 15% of your company's stock. If you think that a VC strategy is a winning strategy, I wish you luck.

To contact author: Visit Beowulf Investments website: [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/] Or, visit Global Village Investment Club Website: [http://home.earthlink.net/~beowulfinvestments/globalvillageinvestmentclubwelcome/]