“Is that opinion of Derek and others at Damanhur?”

“I think so.”

“There are many ‘experts’ who say that light speed is still not transcendable or that time is linear and it is not possible to do many things that I posit in these pages, I know. I offer up this site to these people and say that whole truth of what Black Ops and other agents of real knowledge pursue is not under control of NASA or The Smithsonian and other public or relatively transparent structure of academia and government. Here is a site worth looking into that discusses some of things that many have known for a long time. It does not include Catholic scholar/physicist who reportedly has developed a chronovisor in conjunction with Werner von Braun and Fermi’s inputs that would be similar to one thing Philosopher’s Stone could achieve (http://www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/bpp/TM-107289.htm).

‘Father Pellegrino Maria Ernetti (1925-1994) was a Benedictine priest, scientist, and world-class authority on "archaic" music (pre-Christian to 10th century A.D.). He claimed to have yoked quantum physics to occult arts to construct a time-machine-- chronovisor. Father Ernetti said he had traveled to Rome in 169 B.C. to witness a performance of now-lost tragedy, Thyestes, by father of Latin poetry, Quintus Ennius. He claimed to have used chronovisor to watch Christ dying on cross. Why would so distinguished a churchman have felt need to confabulate such a story? Is Vatican suppressing full truth of Father Ernetti’s life and achievements?’ (5)”

It was clear to Sean that he would have to take a taxi home as wine flowed and his body began to succumb to its cumulative effect.

“Pessimism has depths of feeling and this ideology as prophetic or simply reported as it may be - is worse than any mere pessimism. I prefer to think there are at least some members of our race who have a part to play in all of this. I prefer a 'conspiracy' to a technological determinism. But Martin Heidegger does identify an argument for acting before it is too late. Are there any moral players left in philosophy? Certainly there are, but it is entirely possible they won't be found teaching philosophy in schools. Why assume any Platonic or reversal of same, attitudes with games to control others? Why engage energy in destructive morality? The essence he should have studied is in beauty of each child and on ripples of waves that signal passing of what carries us towards our potential. Let all people know truth which he defines as 'disclosure and unconcealment'. We are of opinion this kind of truth is a necessity for change and creativity. It is often bandied about as 'transparency' in financial circles. If all mankind were able to know these truths then there might be a revival of humanity and an end to cybernetics!” Sean almost croaked as his wits crescendoed into blather and they parted company.

Hunnex continues, “Historically theologians have almost always borrowed methods and models of philosophy to help them in their work. While this is to a certain extent necessary, it has also subjected Christian faith to influence and fate of philosophy. When philosophy in question is abandoned, theology that leaned on it is threatened if not abandoned too. Platonism in its many forms was first philosophy of Christian theologians, but its dualism and otherworldliness gave way to more monistic and naturalistic philosophy of Aristotle in thirteenth century. It was partly distortions of biblical Christianity introduced by Aristotelian philosophy that prompted Reformers to revolt in sixteenth century.

“Unable to assimilate either naturalism or Aristotle or that of scientific revolution, Protestant theology eventually turned to idealism as modern philosophy best adapted to Christian belief. Modern liberalism made its home among idealists during nineteenth century. After World War I it became apparent that idealism was ill suited to twentieth century, and theologians as well as philosophers abandoned it. They turned instead to existentialism as kind of philosophy that did appear to fit mood and needs of twentieth century. Existentialism seemed to be best philosophy for getting at problems of men caught up in swift-moving change.”

I could continue but I’ll suffice in saying this: “Harry Emerson Fosdick once noted that it was not a question of a new or an old theology but a question of a new theology or none at all. On contrary I shall contend, says Hunnex, “that it is not a question of a new or an old theology but a question of same gospel or no gospel at all.” I concur. How about you?

Keep faith. Stay course. Jesus is coming again because He said He was.

Pastor T.Dash