DNA Evidence – History and Status

Written by Nick Smith

Continued from page 1
of different VNTRs, exponentially increasingrepparttar probability that a match betweenrepparttar 143107 two specimens is not an error. Statistically an innocent person would be more likely to winrepparttar 143108 lottery than to be inaccurately convicted using DNA evidence, assuming thatrepparttar 143109 proper number of sequences is analyzed.

Where DNA Evidence Stands Now

The first conviction made using DNA evidence occurred in Portland, Oregon in 1987. Juries seemed hesitant at first to accept DNA evidence as conclusive, perhaps because ofrepparttar 143110 complicated process - which has been extensively simplified for this article - that lawyers and specialists had to explain torepparttar 143111 jurors. The process in its infancy left much room for defense attorneys to insert doubt intorepparttar 143112 cases against their clients. However, as science continued to develop, DNA evidence and technology gained a foothold inrepparttar 143113 United States' courts.

DNA evidence and associated technologies were thrust intorepparttar 143114 limelight when a man byrepparttar 143115 name of O.J. Simpson was accused of killing his ex-wife and her associate in 1995. DNA evidence also played a large role inrepparttar 143116 case ofrepparttar 143117 disappearance of child beauty queen JonBenet Ramsey.

Just as DNA evidence has been used to convict people of crimes, innocent people wrongly accused have also been freed based on DNA evidence analyzed afterrepparttar 143118 fact. Ten people have been freed from death row inrepparttar 143119 United States when DNA technology was finally made available to analyze their cases.

Atrepparttar 143120 time of this writing, several states, prisons, and communities are developing programs to create DNA databases, especially from those considered dangerous felons or high risk criminals. The future of DNA evidence inrepparttar 143121 United States lies inrepparttar 143122 hands of legislatures, courts, and responsible DNA labs.

Nick Smith is an internet marketer specializing in subliminal advertising. For more information about DNA evidence and services, visit Genetree.com.

Rosen Divorce Hosts Free Father’s Day Technology Forum

Written by Alison Kramer

Continued from page 1
Carolina. Founded in 1990,repparttar firm is dedicated to providing individual growth and support to couples seeking divorce by helping them move forward with their lives. Our staff of attorneys, accountants, and specially trained divorce coaches expertly addressrepparttar 143106 complex issues of ending a marriage. Our innovative approach acknowledges that divorce is so much more than just a legal matter. Specialties include child custody, alimony, property distribution, separation agreements, and domestic violence relief.

CONTACT: Alison Kramer, Director of Public Relations, Rosen Divorce, Phone: 919-256- 1542, Cell: 919-523-7104, akramer@rosen.com, www.rosendivorce.com


ROSEN DIVORCE 4101 Lake Boone Trail, Suite 500 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.rosendivorce.com “Divorce is Different Here”


    <Back to Page 1
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use