Continued from page 1
A terrorist would have to understand
internet and
cyber world before he could pull off an attack. On top of that, he would have to gain a realization that
United States depended upon this infrastructure, and then he would have to learn all about it.
We take it for granted because thirteen year olds in
United States and Europe create viruses and worms in their sleep. As a security manager for a major company, I see dozens of viruses every single day, so I just assume that other people understand these things. Well, guess what,
power of
internet is not obvious to ignorant renegade Saudi princes who have been living in
wilderness of Afghanistan for most of their lives.
Certainly it is easier for this uncivilized savage, dumber than earth barbarian (Usama Bin Laden and every other terrorist) to make a gasoline bomb than it is to create one paragraph of intelligent writing. Anyone can make a gasoline bomb out of an airplane, and it certainly does not take many working brain cells to crash one into a skyscraper.
You also have to understand that
internet was designed and built to survive a major, country-wide nuclear attack. That's a lot more power than any terrorist scum is likely to possess.
Is there a danger of cyber-terrorism? Sure there is. This is a critical piece of
world infrastructure and it must be protected, just like any other communication or transportation line.
There is actually more of a danger of cyber-warfare than of cyber-terrorism. Countries do understand
value of
internet, especially highly civilized nations. Generals and soldiers do understand
value of good communications (which is really what
internet is all about). One of
first and most important tasks of any warmaster is to disrupt communications.
Terrorists do not want to disrupt communications. In fact, that's
last thing on their mind, since they survive only as long as communications remain intact. Imagine what would happen to any terrorist whose acts were simply ignored. If no terror resulted, then why try and cause terror? Thus, terrorist targets are specifically chosen to be
most visible, and thus
most communicated. You won't find many terrorists who bomb isolated targets out in Siberia - who would see it?
That, in a nut shell, is why terrorism never has and never will win a war. They are not playing to win - they are playing to terrify. They do cause damage and they do cause, well, terror - but they do not win.
Attacking via
internet might win a war, but it will not cause terror. Thus, it is not a highly tempting target for terrorists. A terrorist attack against it is not impossible, but it is highly unlikely.

Richard Lowe Jr. is the webmaster of Internet Tips And Secrets at http://www.internet-tips.net - Visit our website any time to read over 1,000 complete FREE articles about how to improve your internet profits, enjoyment and knowledge.