Colts’ stadium short on horse senseWritten by Kurt St. Angelo
Continued from page 1
But here’s real crux. The RCA Dome is perfectly good as it is, except for one basic flaw. No, flaw is NOT size of Dome. Although it is smallest in league at 57,900 seats, Colts barely sell Dome out even with ticket prices just below league’s average of $54.75. The problem with RCA Dome stems from how NFL teams share revenue. Owners keep their revenues from private luxury suites. At Dome, Colts owner Jim Irsay has 104 suites. The league’s most profitable franchise, Washington Redskins, has 280. Irsay seeks a stadium with enough suites to give him a shot at a medium profit relative to rest of league. He would have already moved his franchise to Los Angeles had that city promised him a stadium with enough suites, which it could not afford to do. So he and his franchise are leveraging Indianapolis and our state government into building him a stadium by 2008 that merely gives him more profit potential. Ironically, Irsay’s best selling point is that he will not also hold city hostage by making it guarantee that suites it builds him will be sold. Huh? Until then, city expects to pay him at least $36 million to keep Colts in town. Compare this to real costs of a new stadium. Its $500 million price tag can triple by time its bond is paid. For 400 permanent jobs that stadium creates and hundred or so new suites that are created, that amounts to a public investment of over $1 million per job and $3 million per luxury suite. Plus, we will build a stadium with no more capacity than original Hoosier Dome and, from looks of design, one with lousy viewing for NCAA basketball. That’s maddening. Our elected officials are about to build another obsolete stadium with limited capacity, a poor configuration and an exorbitant price tag. They will again saddle us with public debt that is tall on political horseplay and short on horse sense.

Attorney, screen writer and former chair of the Libertarian Party of Marion County.
| | Whose Values Are They Anyway?Written by Virginia Bola, PsyD
Continued from page 1
So what does that say about current state of U.S. morality? We are not all depraved, immoral, addicted to pornography, nor necessarily in favor of public sexual displays. We are simply curious people who are still in a reaction phase to a long history of sexual repression. After strait jacket of puritan period and social constraints of following 300 years, pendulum is swinging as it always has. It makes a wide arc until slowly returning to center. Those who openly seek to legislate morality would do well to recall disastrous social experiment of prohibition, imposed by a righteous and vocal minority, and its permanent legacy of crime, murder, and corruption.

Virginia Bola is a licensed clinical psychologist with deep interests in Social Psychology and politics. She has performed therapeutic services for more than 20 years and has studied the results of cultural forces and employment on the individual. The author of an interactive workbook, The Wolf at the Door: An Unemployment Survival Manual, and a monthly ezine, The Worker's Edge, she can be reached at http://www.virginiabola.com
|