Continued from page 1
On this conception, "physics," which deals with phenomenal appearances, including psychology, is contrasted [p. 62] with
theory of causes, "first things," or "metaphysics."
This philosophical conception so dominates Aristotle's mind that he practically abandons, in theory,
subjective point of view. In his view of
soul, he goes over to a biological conception, which is, however, not that of evolution. Natural species, like
types of Plato, are immutable. The soul is
"first entelechy" or formal cause of
body; in essence it is akin to ether. It embodies also
efficient and final causal principles. Man, in
masculine gender, alone realises
end of nature. Psychology, thus fused with biology, extends to plants and animals and so becomes a comparative science. The plants have nutritive and reproductive souls; they propagate their form. Animals have, besides,
sentient and moving soul, which is endowed with impulse, feeling, and
faculty of imaging. In man, finally,
thinking or rational soul is present. This is implanted in
person before birth from without; and at death it goes back to its source,
divine reason, where it continues in eternal but impersonal form. It is two-fold in its nature in man, partaking both of divine reason and of
sensitive soul; it is both active and passive (nouV poihtikos and nouV paqetikoV).
In
theory of
relation of these souls to one another, Aristotle advances to a genetic and strictly modern point of view. They are not separate "parts," having different local seats in
body, as [p. 63] Plato taught, but functions of
one developing principle. The higher is developed from and includes
lower.
In all this, it is evident that while
objective point of view is maintained, still
doctrine is not
result of a searching of consciousness; nor does it employ a strictly empirical method. It does not isolate
sphere of mind as one of conscious fact, distinct from that of
physical. The results are on
same level for mind, life, and physics in
narrower sense; they are deduced from
immanental conception of nature as a whole. So far Aristotle
metaphysician.
But Aristotle
scientific observer is still to be heard from. It is clear that psychological facts may be observed, just as other facts may be, even in
absence of any clear distinction as to
presence or absence of consciousness. Aristotle set himself to investigate
functions of
soul, looking upon it as
biological principle of form in nature. In this sense, as using an objective method of observation, and as making important and lasting discoveries, he is properly to be described as
pioneer psychologist.” (7)
His insights were boundless and Pseudo-Aristotle or he, himself, also wrote about
Carthaginian ban on travel to America. His insight on
Carthaginian democratic system with a common consent king is important to getting a glimpse of how much better things were in
earlier times before Empire became all
rage. Whether he supported
stupid ban on educating women or just went along because it was politically incorrect and dangerous to do otherwise is something we may never really know. Aquinas re-worked much of Aristotle into
Catholic dogma and many Thomists in that behemoth still hold sway.

Go to World-Mysteries.com if you are interested in books that explain more than the paradigm seeks to let you know. This is an excerpt from one volume of my encyclopedia which can be purchased there.
Author of Diverse Druids Columnist for The ES Press Magazine