Are You Sabotaging Your Site's Visibility?

Written by Kalena Jordan


Continued from page 1
~ 62 percent ofrepparttar Top 100 New Zealand Companies fail to utilise their site TITLE tags effectively. Are you including keywords in your web page TITLE tags instead of just your company name? ~ 13 percent of New Zealand's Top 100 Companies are using techniques that could get them penalised on search engines for "spamming". Are you avoiding techniques considered as "spam" byrepparttar 120753 search engines? ~ The majority (59 percent) of New Zealand's Top 100 Companies use little or no body text on their home page. Are you using plenty of text on your pages for search engines to index? ~ 42 percent ofrepparttar 120754 web sites belonging to New Zealand's Top 100 Companies are inaccessible torepparttar 120755 visually impaired. Are you using ALT IMG attributes for your graphics and image files? ~ 5 percent ofrepparttar 120756 Top 100 New Zealand Companies are not listed in any ofrepparttar 120757 most popular U.S. or New Zealand search engines examined. Have you submitted your site torepparttar 120758 major international and local search engines and directories? ~ 63 percent of New Zealand's Top 100 Companies do not include a META Description Tag on their home page and 70 percent ofrepparttar 120759 Top 100 New Zealand Companies do not include a META Keywords Tag on their home page. Have you included relevant META Tags in your site's HTML code? ~ 78 percent ofrepparttar 120760 Top 100 New Zealand Companies do not use target search terms within their home page text. Do you?

Addressing all these elements will ensure your web site hasrepparttar 120761 best chance possible of being visible in search engines and easily found by your target audience.

Copyright © 2003 by Kalena Jordan. All rights reserved under U.S. and international law.



Article by Kalena Jordan, CEO of Web Rank. Kalena was one of the first search engine optimization experts in Australasia and is well known and respected in her field. For more of her articles on search engine ranking and online marketing, please visit High Search Engine Ranking.




Time To Rate Last Year's Search Engine Predictions

Written by Kalena Jordan


Continued from page 1

Score: Nostradamus

5. Death of Two Majors

My prediction here read: "I think 2002 will signalrepparttar demise for at least two ofrepparttar 120752 major search engines and directories".

In 2002 we said goodbye to industry veterans Excite and Northern Light. Excite ceased to be a major player in January 2002, when new owners InfoSpace replaced Excite's search database listings with a mixture of Overture paid results and Inktomi search results. Excite UK shut their doors aroundrepparttar 120753 same time. These daysrepparttar 120754 Excite portal still exists, but nobody searches there anymore. Perhaps it's because Excite now uses a mixture of regular and PPC listings from Google, LookSmart, Inktomi, Ask Jeeves, About, Overture, FindWhat and FAST, with no disclaimers to help searchers identify which are paid results.

In January 2002, Northern Light closed its public search service. A week later, Divine, inc., a provider of content management and delivery solutions for enterprise customers, boughtrepparttar 120755 search site. In a separate deal atrepparttar 120756 same time, Yahoo partnered with Divine to make Northern Light's Special Collection documents available in a new service called Yahoo Premium Documents Search.

Technically we could say that HotBot also "died" in 2002, given it lost its own search database and became a META search engine in December to display search results from search FAST, Google, Inktomi and Teoma underrepparttar 120757 ownership of Terra Lycos.

Score: Nostradamus

6. One or More Major Partnerships

My prediction was: "I see some major rivals combining in 2002, just to stay alive. I also see some more major partnerships between online and offline firms".

The Yahoo deal with Google in October 2002 to provide combined search listings and Yahoo's purchase announcement of Inktomi in December 2002 spring to mind here. So dorepparttar 120758 many partnerships between Google and search rivals Ask Jeeves / Teoma, AOL and InfoSpace forrepparttar 120759 provision of AdWords paid listings (as listed in 1. above) in 2002 andrepparttar 120760 expansion of Overture via partnerships with various search engines, directories and portals worldwide.

Let's not forgetrepparttar 120761 Lycos / FAST deal for paid inclusion services either. Yahoo's 2002 move intorepparttar 120762 ISP market and Ask Jeeves' provision of an offline "butler service" are relevant torepparttar 120763 latter half of this prediction.

Score: Nostradamus

7. Move away from In-House to Outsourced Services

My original article predicted: "As search engine optimization becomes even more complex and time consuming in 2002, more businesses will realize SEO is a full-time job and not something their marketing or IT staff can do ‘onrepparttar 120764 side'."

A year ago, if you had gone to a major employment site such as careerbuilder.com or monster.com and conducted a search for "search engine optimization", you would have been hard-pressed to find many jobs in this field. Do a search today and you'd be amazed atrepparttar 120765 increase in demand for SEO specialists - just as predicted.

Score: Nostradamus

8. SEO industry Shake-Up

My prediction was: "With consumer watchdogs keeping a close eye, developing industry standards and ethics, as well asrepparttar 120766 crackdown on spammers sure to continue,repparttar 120767 SEO industry is sure to experience a major shake-up next year, with onlyrepparttar 120768 most successful and ethical SEO's left still standing."

You could say that 2002 gave rise torepparttar 120769 ethical SEO. A line inrepparttar 120770 sand was drawn between so-called "ethical" search engine optimizers and marketers (SEM's) and "unethical" search engine optimization firms, nicknamed "Search engine deceivers" (SED's) by some. A number of long-time SED's found themselves permanently banned for search engine spamming by Google in 2002, torepparttar 120771 sheer delight of many inrepparttar 120772 industry. As more search engines introduced or tightened their anti-spam filters in 2002, many shady SEO cowboys were forced to pack up shop as they realized their spam techniques were no longer effective.

Google's unprecedented decision to publish their definition of "ethical" search engine optimization on their Webmaster Guidelines page forced many search engine marketing firms to rethink their SEO techniques. It was alsorepparttar 120773 start of what many believe is a new era inrepparttar 120774 industry, where search engines and professional SEO's start to communicate openly, creating an information exchange forrepparttar 120775 possible development of an industry-wide set of acceptable search engine optimization standards.

Score: Nostradamus

9. New Technologies

My final prediction read: "I'm sure there will be some significant technological developments in 2002 that will impactrepparttar 120776 search engine industry and make us all head forrepparttar 120777 forums and chat rooms in a panic."

Sure enough, developments such as Google News, Gator, LookSmart LookListings,repparttar 120778 SEO Consultants Directory, Overture's Auto-Bidding Tool, Froogle, Wireless Search, TopText, Link Loader, MPZ Format,repparttar 120779 Chinese Government's ban on Google and Search King's PR Ad Network resulted in some frantic forum activity in 2002.

But none of these compare torepparttar 120780 storm in a teacup caused by a little green bar. Yep, Google Page Rank™ gets my vote forrepparttar 120781 most talked about technology in search for 2002.

Score: Nostradamus

So with a final score of eight out of nine, it looks like I'm ninety percent Nostradamus after all (-: .



Article by Kalena Jordan, CEO of Web Rank. Kalena was one of the first search engine optimization experts in Australasia and is well known and respected in her field. For more of her articles on search engine ranking and online marketing, please visit High Search Engine Ranking.


    <Back to Page 1
 
ImproveHomeLife.com © 2005
Terms of Use