A Privacy TreatiseWritten by Kathleen Pierz
Continued from page 1
Today, for most types of personal and professional contact information, there are two options: listed and not listed. Many other communications points are “unlisted” in sense that they are not easily available in a directory such as email or websites. These other communications methods are more likely to be considered permissions-based devices. Those communication methods that require subscriber to provide their specific contact information to those they wish to reach them. Privacy is what your customer says it is Legal and regulatory definitions ultimately matter less than what your customer believes or expects. On most US wireless subscriber contracts today, text appears that states that upon signing contract subscriber grants their express permission for their number to be utilized for directory purposes. This does not mean that adding mobile numbers to DA/DQ database will be easy, or even go unchallenged. In fact very few consumers are aware of fact that their mobile numbers could, technically, be listed today. Consumers perceive their mobile numbers to be private independent of their current legal status consumers believe them to be private. Any across-the-board move to change this would likely meet with not only customer opposition but possible regulatory intervention. This discussion extends beyond introduction of wireless numbers in US DA/DQ database. It will ultimately expand to include range of possible ways in which one can be contacted. A viable model must be found and implemented that both provides for connectivity, but that also gives consumers control over who may contact them, when, where and how. This is especially true in US market, given combination of over zealous telemarketing efforts and a general disregard for personal privacy (in contrast to Scandinavian countries where more than 90% of all phone numbers, including mobile phones, are listed). There is a huge upside (revenues from WDA are estimated at $3.4 Billion annually) and a huge downside (inability to launch WDA, erosion in fixed line database, inability to launch future services, increased regulation) if market fails to achieve precise mix of communications and control. A New Model for Privacy AND Communication Providing greater consumer privacy and better connectivity at same time are not mutually exclusive ends. This issue extends beyond wireless numbers to include a range of personal contact points. If directory providers are not providing it, regulators have a demonstrated zeal for stepping in and regulating privacy – which can ultimately be to detriment of all parties. Without a change, call volumes will decline, and we argue, out ability to communicate with one and other will be increasingly limited. The Formula Carriers and DA/DQ providers who can integrate following five points, into their service and effectively communicating them to consumers will ultimately be successful at providing better services to their customers. 1. Consumers want control 2. Consumers will not tolerate abuse 3. Information must become individual-centric rather than location centric 4. Timing: Now is time to act 5. Education: Consumers Need to Know For a full text of this article visit http:www.pierzgroup.com

Ms. Pierz is one of the best known industry analysts in the directory assistance/enquiry space. Kathleen holds a Master's degree in International Management from the American Graduate School of International Management (Thunderbird) and a Bachelor of Science Degree in Business from The University of Colorado.
| | Industrial ppm CO measurementsWritten by Scott Cowe of Dover Gas Technologies
Continued from page 1 higher temperature coefficient, this leads to zero instability making it unsuitable for our task. Carbon and chemical filters are often attached to face of sensor or added in sample stream to diminish effects of cross interference to many of commonly encountered such as H2S, SO2, NO x, etc.. This filter, it’s efficiency and life span can be an important consideration when measuring CO in 0-50ppm range. In a number of applications background levels of Hydrogen given off by nearby processes have been found to cause major problems with accurate low level carbon monoxide measurements and alarms. While it is possible for hydrogen levels to cause safety concerns that should be reported, limit is magnitudes higher than what causes CO alarms to trigger on most instruments. A hydrogen level of as little as 60ppm can trip CO alarms of many analyzers. The lower explosive limit (lel)for hydrogen is 4%, ten percent of that l.e.l. would be 4000ppm, so we see that 60ppm is insignificant to personnel safety but remains problematic to carbon monoxide measurement. This cross interference can not be easily overcome with chemical filters and therefore required a different approach. It has been found that by measuring hydrogen separately and using that signal in conjunction with mixed CO/H2 signal majority of interference can be nulled out, again manufactures deal with this differently with varying results. The use of two separate sensors can create a compensation lag time and there may be temperature coefficient differences between sensors, either of which will cause errors in readings and provide false alarms. Similar temperature problems can be found with units that use a single sensor but do electronic nulling and temperature compensation remote of sensor itself. There are sensors now available that have separate electrodes for H2 and CO/H2 signals with nulling and temperature compensation circuit attached directly to rear of sensor itself. The output of this surface mount board is in millivolt range making it less susceptible to interference and change from wiring, connectors and temperature effects. Each sensor and attached PCB come completely pre-calibrated for H2 cross interference and relative CO output. Only a single calibration gas is required over life of sensor (2 years) with no need for re calibration of hydrogen signal nulling found in any of units put into service. In addition, internal chemical filter provides excellent reduction of cross interference due to other common gasses found. This customer replaceable sensor has proven itself over time to provide consistently accurate results in demanding applications against competitors instruments. Dover Gas Technologies Inc. www.dovergas.com incorporates such a sensor, we believe it best suits needs addressed above and use it in many of our portable, transmitter, and monitor products for low level ppm CO measurement.

President and operations manager of Dover Gas since 1991 with 8 years of prior experience in the gas analysis field.
|