Many of our readers do not have access to any libraries of much size. You might be interested in what some of
earlier writers believed.In "The Duration and Nature of Future Punishment" by Henry Constable (1868), we find a little table of early writers and their views on this subject. The death date of each is given.
Barnabas (90), Clement of Rome (100), Hermas (l04), Ignatius,Martyr (107), Polycarp,Martyr (147). Justin,Martyr (164), and Theophius, of Antioch (183); all held to
Scriptural view that
supreme penalty for all who did not have life was eternal death.
Then came a couple of minor writers:
Athenagoras (190) and Tatian (200), who were steeped in
Greek philosophies of Plato and Aristotle. The Greeks got their ideas from Babylon. So these two advanced
idea of
immortality of
soul (Genesis 3:4 And
serpent said unto
woman, Ye shall not surely die:). Their writings were not taken too seriously and they were considered more or less as heretics.
Two more writers, true to
Word, came in about this time. They were Irenaeus, Martyr (202) and Clement Alexandrinus (212).
Then
Greek influence again was felt. Tertullian (235) not only came out with
theory of
immortality of
soul, but he also taught
eternal conscious torment of
lost. This idea came especially from
Greek myths, which they themselves did not believe. They were simply stories to entertain. Hippolytus (240) followed with
same ideas.
This was so revolting to Origen (253) that he invented
idea of universal restoration because he accepted
theory of
immortality of
soul. Something had to be done with
soul. Since man had become as God, (another lie of Satan), and had immortality and could not die, even God not having power to destroy him, there was a question of what to do with man.
Arnobius {303) still held to
teaching of
Scriptures. He was about
last of those who had
truth. Then followed Augustine {430). He fastened both false teachings,
immortality of
soul and
eternal conscious torment of
wicked, on to
church and it has stuck till now. It is so strongly imbedded that no reformation seems to be able to eradicate it.
Now you can begin to see why there is so little said today about resurrection. It is not needed by an immortal soul. Why bother with a body?